[gmx-users] charge groups
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue May 10 19:00:06 CEST 2011
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
> Hi Justin
>
> The two files processed.top and topol.top are the exact same. What is
> worrying me is that when I look at the topol.tpr from gmxdump, my charge
> groups do not seem to be specified the way I stated in the topology file.
>
Can you provide a relevant snippet of the gmxdump output to demonstrate this?
Consecutive numbering is not stated as a requirement in the manual, and if it is
in the code, then it needs to be either documented as being necessary, and/or an
enhancement request needs to be filed on redmine for non-consecutive charge
group numbering.
-Justin
> Gavin
>
> Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>>
>> Gavin Melaugh wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Do atoms belonging to the same charge group have to be indexed
>>> consecutively in the topology file or can you have the following.
>>>
>>> [atoms]
>>> 1 CA 1 CGE CA 1 -0.1150 12.0110
>>> 2 CB 1 CGE CB 1 0.0000 12.0110
>>> 3 CA 1 CGE CA 2 -0.1150 12.0110
>>> 4 CB 1 CGE :wq
>>> CB 2 0.0000 12.0110
>> Assuming you fix this, then yes, splitting charge groups can work.
>> Use grompp -pp to see the post-processed topology to make sure
>> everything came out as expected.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>>> 5 CA 1 CGE CA 3 -0.1150 12.0110
>>> 6 CB 1 CGE CB 3 0.0000 12.0110
>>> 7 HC 1 CGE HC 1 0.1150 1.0080
>>> 8 CU 1 CGE CU 13 0.2650 13.0190
>>> 9 NU 1 CGE NU 13 -0.5970 14.0070
>>> 10 HC 1 CGE HC 2 0.1150 1.0080
>>> 11 CU 1 CGE CU 14 0.2650 13.0190
>>> 12 NU 1 CGE NU 14 -0.5970 14.0070
>>> 13 HC 1 CGE HC 3 0.1150 1.0080
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Gavin
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list