[gmx-users] Pme on gpu performance

[Szilárd Páll]

Thanks for the info.
--
Szilárd

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Andrzej Rzepiela
<Andrzej.Rzepiela at physik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thank you for the info. The data that I obtained for comparison was
> performed  with GTX580, 4 fs timestep and heavy hydrogen atoms instead of
> constraints, as you suspected.  For dhfr with PME they were able to get 100
> ns a day. I tested the same system on Tesla M2090 with 2fs timestep and
> constraints and was bale to get ~11 ns a day. Thus the factor of five that I
> reported.
>
> Andrzej
>
>
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> GROMACS 4.6 is work in progress, it will have native CUDA acceleration
>> with multi-GPU support along a few other improvements. You can expect
>> a speedup in the ballpark of 3x. We will soon have the code available
>> for testing.
>>
>> I'm a little skeptical about the 5x of ACEMD. What setting did you
>> use? AFAIR they were using large time-steps without contraints in
>> their benchmarks.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Szilárd
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww interface
> or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>