[gmx-users] Re: strangeness in gro file
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Sep 15 03:56:37 CEST 2011
Mark Abraham wrote:
> On 15/09/2011 11:23 AM, Sweta Iyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>> I did a grompp without the temperature coupling and generated a .tpr
>> file. From that I generated a .gro file using editconf. What it looks
>> like now is it starts numbering from 1 -29, which is where the first
>> monomer ends, again 1-29 for the second monomer and then its
>> continuous numbering from then on!
>
> That looks weird.
>
I've seen this for dimeric proteins where the chains are identical. A little
annoying to deal with.
>> DMPC starts from 30 and its continuous till the end of the coordinate
>> file! This still wouldnt let me generate an index file as the
>> numbering still overlaps between the two protein chains. :(
>
> As I said last time, the atom numbers in the coordinate file are not
> significant. You can make them all zero, and make_ndx will still let you
> make an index file that will work. Only the ordering is significant. The
> contortions that I thought would regularize the numbers were only to
> help you double check what is happening.
>
>> Would it have a made a difference if, instead of including a TER after
>> one chain of the complex, I just changed the chain id to distinguish
>> them as separate entities in the original pdb file that i used to
>> begin with? I would have thought it shouldnt make a difference and has
>> nothing to do with this issue!
>
> I don't know.
>
genconf -renumber solves all of this rather easily, I think.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list