[gmx-users] any alternative methods?
mailmd2011 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 22 15:54:36 CEST 2012
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still
curious for the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13
which are the same weired to me. here is the screen shot for this residue.
thanks again for comments
On 08/22/2012 03:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
> On 8/22/12 9:12 AM, Albert wrote:
>> hello Justin:
>> thanks for reply.
>> I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the
>> output, I
>> found the following line:
>> 368 4.295 3.8840018217
>> I just wondering how could it possible fro residue 368 with a value
>> of 3.88?
> My guess would be that this particular lipid is probably bound very
> tightly to some protein residue, which leads to the protein and lipid
> both contributing to the lateral area in that region. In this case,
> the protein contributes more area than the lipid does. You should
> look at the coordinate file and see what this residue is doing.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users