[gmx-users] Incorrect bond in top file
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Aug 27 20:38:17 CEST 2012
On 8/27/12 2:35 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
> Please take a look at the .top file generated:
>
>
> 1 C 1 FVAL CN 1 0.357 12.011 ; qtot 0.357
> 2 HA 1 FVAL H1 2 0.1 1.008 ; qtot 0.457
> 3 O 1 FVAL ON 3 -0.51 15.999 ; qtot -0.053
> 4 NH1 1 FVAL N 4 -0.423 14.007 ; qtot -0.476
> 5 H 1 FVAL HN 5 0.333 1.008 ; qtot -0.143
> 6 CT1 1 FVAL CA 6 0.034 12.011 ; qtot -0.109
> 7 HB 1 FVAL HA 7 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.019
> 8 CT1 1 FVAL CB 8 -0.093 12.011 ; qtot -0.112
> 9 HA 1 FVAL HB 9 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.022
> 10 CT3 1 FVAL CG1 10 -0.268 12.011 ; qtot -0.29
> 11 HA 1 FVAL HG11 11 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.2
> 12 HA 1 FVAL HG12 12 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.11
> 13 HA 1 FVAL HG13 13 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.02
> 14 CT3 1 FVAL CG2 14 -0.268 12.011 ; qtot -0.288
> 15 HA 1 FVAL HG21 15 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.198
> 16 HA 1 FVAL HG22 16 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.108
> 17 HA 1 FVAL HG23 17 0.09 1.008 ; qtot -0.018
> 18 C 1 FVAL C 18 0.528 12.011 ; qtot 0.51
> 19 O 1 FVAL O 19 -0.51 15.999 ; qtot 0
> ; residue 2 SER rtp SER q 0.0
> 20 NH1 2 SER N 20 -0.47 14.007 ; qtot -0.47
>
> I visualized the .gro file, found CN-HN bond.
>
What appears in a visualization program is irrelevant. They all have algorithms
designed to guess what's connected by distance search, or some variation
thereof. What's definitive is the [bonds] section of the topology. If that
says there is a bond between the two atoms in question, then there's a problem.
From the .rtp and .hdb entries, I can see no reason why pdb2gmx would make a bond.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list