[gmx-users] Parametrisation of the cyclic nucleotides in Gromos force fields

Justin Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Dec 12 18:12:17 CET 2012



On 12/12/12 11:49 AM, James Starlight wrote:
> New problem during processing of y structure via GROMPP
>
> ERROR 217 [file topol.top, line 34183]:
>    No default Improper Dih. types
>
>
> ERROR 218 [file topol.top, line 34184]:
>    No default Improper Dih. types
>
>
> ERROR 219 [file topol.top, line 34185]:
>    No default Improper Dih. types
>
>
> ERROR 220 [file topol.top, line 34186]:
>    No default Improper Dih. types
>
>
> ERROR 221 [file topol.top, line 34187]:
>    No default Improper Dih. types
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Fatal error:
> Unknown cmap torsion between atoms 915 917 919 934 946
> 1) Does the errors about Improper types due to non-standart atom names
> in the RTP? Must I use only standard charmm atom names in that section
> ? ( I've used Swiss Param's abbreviation see below)
>

The names are irrelevant, but the types are what lead to the error.  The CMAP 
torsions should only involve backbone atoms, and therefore no special types are 
needed.  You should be using standard CHARMM atom types.

>   [ impropers ]
> CG2  CD1  CB2  CD2
> CD1  CE1  CG2  HD1
> CD2  CE2  CG2  HD2
> CE2  CZ   CD2  HE2
> CB2  CA2  CG2  HB2
> CA2  N2   CB2  C2
> C1   CA1  N2   N3
> CA1  N    C1   CB1
> CA1  CB1  C1   HA1
> CB1  OG1  CA1  CG1
> CB1  CG1  CA1  HB1
> C2   N3   CA2  O3
> N3   C2   C1   CA3
> CA3  C    N3   HA33
> CA3  HA33 N3   HA32
> CZ   CE1  CE2  OH
> CE1  CZ   CD1  HE1
> CG1  HG11 CB1  HG12
> CG1  HG11 CB1  HG13
> ; with next residue
> C    +N   CA3  O
> ; with previous residue
> N    -C   CA1  H11
>
>
> 2 ) In the fatal error the  915 917 919 93 atoms is the C atom of i-2
> N Cb  C atoms of i-1 and N of the i-residue where i is the
> chromophore.
>
> In the RTP file I notice that CMAP for standard amino acids is the
> from N to C end of the corresponded and\or adjacent residues. How I
> could define it for my chromophore composed from 3 residues-like
> objects ? Should something like below example work ? Also I didnt
> observe such CMAP for HEME molecule.
>

CMAP is only applied to backbone atoms.  It should be possible to define the 
chromophore's backbone just like any other residue.  Heme will not have any CMAP 
terms because it is a prosthetic group and does not have any backbone atoms.

-Justin

> [ cmap ]
>   -C	N	CA1	C1	N3
>   C1     N3      CA3     C       +N
>
> In tht exmple -C and +N atoms of adjacent residues and others atoms
> are from chromophore.
>
> James
>
>
> 2012/12/12, James Starlight <jmsstarlight at gmail.com>:
>> Justin,
>>
>> The IMPROPERS consisted of atom names (its correct as I understood).
>> The bond tern I've changed. The resulted RTP
>>
>> [CRO]
>>   [ atoms ]
>> CG2  CB     0.0284 0
>> CD1  CB    -0.1500 1
>> CD2  CB    -0.1500 2
>> CE1  CB    -0.1500 3
>> CE2  CB    -0.1500 4
>> CZ   CB     0.0825 5
>> N    NC=O  -0.7301 6
>> CA1  CR     0.3611 7
>> CB1  CR     0.2800 8
>> CG1  CR     0.0000 9
>> OG1  OR    -0.6800 10
>> C1   C=O    0.4490 11
>> N2   N=C   -0.6210 12
>> N3   NC=O  -0.4201 13
>> C2   C=O    0.6156 14
>> O3   O=C   -0.5700 15
>> CA2  C=C    0.1854 16
>> CA3  CR     0.3611 17
>> C    C=O    0.5690 18
>> O    O=C   -0.5700 19
>> CB2  C=C   -0.1784 20
>> OH   OR    -0.5325 21
>> HA1  HCMM   0.0000 22
>> HA32 HCMM   0.0000 23
>> HA33 HCMM   0.0000 24
>> HD1  HCMM   0.1500 25
>> HD2  HCMM   0.1500 26
>> HE1  HCMM   0.1500 27
>> HE2  HCMM   0.1500 28
>> HG11 HCMM   0.0000 29
>> HG12 HCMM   0.0000 30
>> HG13 HCMM   0.0000 31
>> HOG1 HOR    0.4000 32
>> HB2  HCMM   0.1500 33
>> H11  HNCO   0.3700 34
>> HH   HOCC   0.4500 35
>> HB1  HCMM   0.0000 36
>>   [ bonds ]
>> HG11 CG1
>> HG12 CG1
>> CG1  HG13
>> CG1  CB1
>> OG1  HOG1
>> OG1  CB1
>> CB1  HB1
>> CB1  CA1
>> HE2  CE2
>> N    H11
>> N    CA1
>> HH   OH
>> CA1  HA1
>> CA1  C1
>> CE2  CD2
>> CE2  CZ
>> HD2  CD2
>> OH   CZ
>> CD2  CG2
>> CZ   CE1
>> N2   C1
>> N2   CA2
>> C1   N3
>> HA33 CA3
>> CG2  CB2
>> CG2  CD1
>> CE1  HE1
>> CE1  CD1
>> CA2  CB2
>> CA2  C2
>> N3   CA3
>> N3   C2
>> CB2  HB2
>> CA3  C
>> CA3  HA32
>> CD1  HD1
>> C2   O3
>> C    O
>>   [ impropers ]
>> CG2  CD1  CB2  CD2
>> CD1  CE1  CG2  HD1
>> CD2  CE2  CG2  HD2
>> CE2  CZ   CD2  HE2
>> CB2  CA2  CG2  HB2
>> CA2  N2   CB2  C2
>> C1   CA1  N2   N3
>> CA1  N    C1   CB1
>> CA1  CB1  C1   HA1
>> CB1  OG1  CA1  CG1
>> CB1  CG1  CA1  HB1
>> C2   N3   CA2  O3
>> N3   C2   C1   CA3
>> CA3  C    N3   HA33
>> CA3  HA33 N3   HA32
>> CZ   CE1  CE2  OH
>> CE1  CZ   CD1  HE1
>> CG1  HG11 CB1  HG12
>> CG1  HG11 CB1  HG13
>> ; with next residue
>> C    +N   CA3  O
>> ; with previous residue
>> N    -C   CA1  H11
>>
>> That produce correct structure from my eGFP model :) But I suppose
>> that charges should be changed in accordance to the paper which you
>> provide me ( in my case charges were assigned by Swiss Param's
>> building blocks)
>>
>>
>> Thanks for help
>>
>> James
>>
>> 2012/12/12, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/12 6:54 AM, James Starlight wrote:
>>>> Oh that problem was imperically resolved by renamind O2 ( which are
>>>> not terminal but pdb2gmx define them as a terminal ) atom to O3
>>>>
>>>> The only question about my chromophore is the definition of the IMPROPER
>>>> groups.
>>>> As I've posted above my initial model was CAPPED from C and N termi by
>>>> NH2 and Ace. The resulted topology consisted of Improper for bonds
>>>> between chromophore atoms and Capped groups ( e.g :
>>>>
>>>> With ACE (C-3 O-1 C-4 H-11 H-12 H-1 )
>>>> IMPH C    N1   CA3  O
>>>> IMPH N    C3   CA1  H11
>>>> IMPH C3   O1   N    C4
>>>> IMPH C4   HC11 C3   H1
>>>> IMPH C4   HC11 C3   H12
>>>>
>>>> With NH2  (N1-H2-H3)
>>>> IMPH N1   H2   C    H3
>>>> IMPH C    N1   CA3  O
>>>> That strings were removed from chromophore RTP. But in my final model
>>>> there are 2 amino acids insted of capped groups so the IPROPERS must
>>>> be inclusion for protein-chromophore nonds. How it could be done ?
>>>>
>>>> In some amino acids I've found -N and -C blocks that (if I understood
>>>> correctly) for C and N atoms of the adjacent residues. How that atoms
>>>> must be defined correctly in the protein-chromophore comples ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> + and - indicate next and previous residues, respectively.  Presumably
>>> your
>>>
>>> chromophore engages in the same types of peptide bonds as any other amino
>>> acid,
>>> so the syntax is the same as any other case.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> --
>>> ========================================
>>>
>>> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
>>> Research Scientist
>>> Department of Biochemistry
>>> Virginia Tech
>>> Blacksburg, VA
>>> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
>>> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>>>
>>> ========================================
>>> --
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>

-- 
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list