[gmx-users] Re: Langevin Dynamics
Dr. Vitaly Chaban
vvchaban at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 18:40:26 CET 2012
If you have a correct temperature for the particle of interest,
everything is correct.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:38 PM, tarak karmakar <tarak20489 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dr. Vitaly
> Yeap !
> From that point of view I'm seeing the correct temperature drift and
> it reaches nicely to 300 K after say, 300ps.
> But is it a good integrator ( SD ) to perform this job ? Or, should I
> opt for other, like Lep-frog or MD-VV with let say , Berendsen
> Please explain a bit.
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Dr. Vitaly Chaban <vvchaban at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am going to do US simulation in a protein. For this purpose I have
>>> heated the protein from 0 to 300 K by using 'SD' integrator. But I am
>>> bit confused with this integrator.
>>> How good is to use Langevin Dynamics to heat a protein ?
>> Look at the temperature of protein and decide.
>> Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
>> MEMPHYS - Center for Biomembrane Physics
>> Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy
>> University of Southern Denmark
>> Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
MEMPHYS - Center for Biomembrane Physics
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy
University of Southern Denmark
Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users