[gmx-users] Trajectory
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Jan 30 15:11:35 CET 2012
Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu
> <mailto:jalemkul at vt.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Abraham
> <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au <mailto:Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
> <mailto:Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.__au
> <mailto:Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>>> wrote:
>
> On 30/01/2012 8:43 PM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>
> Dear Gmx Users,
> I run the simulation of protein with 10 ligands (200
> ns). In total
> I should have total of 4000 frames as I set up:
>
> nsteps = 100000000
>
> dt = 0.002
>
> nstxout = 25000
>
>
> ... iff the simulation completed successfully.
>
>
> I used trjconv -f md.trr -o mdnojump.xtc -pbc nojump
>
> The trajectory which I read in VMD has 3008 frames and my
> ligands
> completely disappear after 8 frame (They are not in PBC
> windows
> which I checked in Graphics -> Graphical Representation
> -> Periodic)
>
>
> Your choice of trjconv workflow demands that the protein be
> allowed
> to diffuse away. What VMD makes of that is not really of
> consequence
> to discuss here. Perhaps you can design a better trjconv
> workflow,
> as here
>
> http://www.gromacs.org/__Documentation/Terminology/__Periodic_Boundary_Conditions
> <http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions>
>
>
> Thank you. I managed to fix it using:
> trjconv -f md.trr -o md1000.xtc -skip 4 (1000 frames instead
> of 4000)
> Then accoring to the workflow (PBC) I used:
>
> trjconv -f md1000.xtc -s md.tpr -pbc mol -o mdmol.xtc
> trjconv -f mdmol.xtc -s md.tpr -center -o mdCENTER.xtc (Center
> on a protein, output - System)
>
> trjconv -f mdCENTER.xtc -s md.tpr -fit rot+trans -o mdFit.xtc
> (Protein, output - System)
>
>
> However, all ligands jump rapidly
>
> around the protein till the time they bind to the protein
> surface (and the begining they were randomly placed around the
> protein) one by one. At the end when all of them stacked on my
> protein everything is ok. Will you suggest something?
>
>
>
>
> Is this unusual? It sounds like the molecules diffuse around until
> they bind to the protein. You're centering on the protein and then
> fitting its translation and rotation; everything else will be
> processed relative to those criteria.
>
> -Justin
>
> Sorry, I did not clarify it properly. What is unusual is that
> my ligands (until they bind) jump to its periodic images. It is a speed
> light diffusion :) Any suggestions?
>
Nope. As I said, you fitted everything on the protein (which is sensible).
Everything else is manipulated accordingly. Perhaps it's a bit inconvenient to
watch, but there's no real way to avoid periodic jumps of every molecule
simultaneously, you need a reference position, which for you is the protein.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list