[gmx-users] Trajectory
Steven Neumann
s.neumann08 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 15:07:34 CET 2012
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Steven Neumann wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au<mailto:
>> Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.**au <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>>> wrote:
>>
>> On 30/01/2012 8:43 PM, Steven Neumann wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Gmx Users,
>>> I run the simulation of protein with 10 ligands (200 ns). In
>>> total
>>> I should have total of 4000 frames as I set up:
>>>
>>> nsteps = 100000000
>>>
>>> dt = 0.002
>>>
>>> nstxout = 25000
>>>
>>>
>> ... iff the simulation completed successfully.
>>
>>
>> I used trjconv -f md.trr -o mdnojump.xtc -pbc nojump
>>>
>>> The trajectory which I read in VMD has 3008 frames and my ligands
>>> completely disappear after 8 frame (They are not in PBC windows
>>> which I checked in Graphics -> Graphical Representation -> Periodic)
>>>
>>>
>> Your choice of trjconv workflow demands that the protein be allowed
>> to diffuse away. What VMD makes of that is not really of consequence
>> to discuss here. Perhaps you can design a better trjconv workflow,
>> as here
>> http://www.gromacs.org/**Documentation/Terminology/**
>> Periodic_Boundary_Conditions<http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions>
>>
>>
>> Thank you. I managed to fix it using:
>> trjconv -f md.trr -o md1000.xtc -skip 4 (1000 frames instead of 4000)
>> Then accoring to the workflow (PBC) I used:
>>
>> trjconv -f md1000.xtc -s md.tpr -pbc mol -o mdmol.xtc
>> trjconv -f mdmol.xtc -s md.tpr -center -o mdCENTER.xtc (Center on a
>> protein, output - System)
>>
>> trjconv -f mdCENTER.xtc -s md.tpr -fit rot+trans -o mdFit.xtc (Protein,
>> output - System)
>>
>>
>> However, all ligands jump rapidly
>>
>> around the protein till the time they bind to the protein surface (and
>> the begining they were randomly placed around the protein) one by one. At
>> the end when all of them stacked on my protein everything is ok. Will you
>> suggest something?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Is this unusual? It sounds like the molecules diffuse around until they
> bind to the protein. You're centering on the protein and then fitting its
> translation and rotation; everything else will be processed relative to
> those criteria.
>
> -Justin
>
> Sorry, I did not clarify it properly. What is unusual is that
my ligands (until they bind) jump to its periodic images. It is a speed
light diffusion :) Any suggestions?
> --
> ==============================**==========
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin<http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin>
>
> ==============================**==========
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users<http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
> Support/Mailing_Lists/Search<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search>before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120130/619f1908/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list