[gmx-users] Implicit solvent setup for large protein
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Wed Jul 4 04:45:39 CEST 2012
On 07/03/2012 11:01 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> On 7/3/12 8:57 AM, Ramon Crehuet Simon wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I know several questions about implict solvent have already been
>> asked in this list. I think and hope the question I have has not been
>> raised. Forgive me if I am wrong.
>> I have read that all-to-all kernels are the best option when doing
>> implicit solvent. Otherwise one should use large cutoffs.
>> I wanto to simulate a tetramer which has more than 1200 residues. I'm
>> afraid all-to-all interactions are much too expensive in this case.
>> So I should use largecutoffs. My question is, how large? Or, to be
>> more precise, what should I monitor to check the the cutoffs are
>> large enough?
>> As an extra questions, if I don't use all-to-all kernels, is it still
>> worth using the GPU to accelerate the calculation?
> In my experience, using long cutoffs leads to unstable trajectories
> and very poor energy conservation. The all-vs-all kernels are the
> only ones I use for implicit calculations.
... and you should check out DOI 10.1002/jcc.21552 and
10.1021/ct700053u, as well as the literature for any other implicit
solvation protocol you might like to implement in GROMACS. Making stuff
up is worth the effort you put into it...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users