[gmx-users] Re: angle constraints
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Wed Jul 25 14:53:25 CEST 2012
On 25/07/2012 10:08 PM, Thomas Schlesier wrote:
> What you have done there looks very strange...
> easiest wy would be:
> define the two oxygens as normal atoms (1,2), give them a bondlength
> twotimes the C-O bond length
> define the carbon as a dummy (3), while you construct it's position
> from both oxygens with a=0.5
> one thing i don't know is how to handle the mass:
> 1) give both oxygen half of the system mass
> 2) give all atoms their normal mass
> would tend to (2)
One should want to get both the total mass and the moment of inertia
correct...
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2003-September/007095.html.
Mark
>
> greetings
> thomas
>
> Am 25.07.2012 13:15, schrieb gmx-users-request at gromacs.org:
>> How to choose the positions of the dummy atoms while constraining the
>> angle for a linear triatomic molecule?
>> The topology for a such molecule ( af for example CO2 ) is as follows
>>
>> [ moleculetype ]
>> ; Name nrexcl
>> CO2 2
>>
>> [ atoms ]
>> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass
>> typeB chargeB massB
>> ; residue 503 CO rtp CO q 0.0
>> 1 D1 503 CO D1 1 0 21.90158
>> ; qtot 0
>> 2 D2 503 CO D2 2 0 21.90158
>> ; qtot 0
>> 3 CE 503 CO CO 3 0.7 0.00000
>> ; qtot 0.7
>> 4 OE 503 CO OC1 4 -0.35 0.00000
>> ; qtot 0.35
>> 5 OE 503 CO OC2 5 -0.35 0.00000
>> ; qtot 0.35
>> [ constraints ]
>> ; ai aj funct b0
>> 1 2 1 0.2000
>>
>> [ dummies2 ]
>> ; ai aj ak funct a
>> 3 1 2 1 0.0170
>> 4 1 2 1 0.1000
>> 5 1 2 1 0.2170
>>
>>
>> [ exclusions ]
>> 3 4 5
>> 4 5 3
>> 5 4 3
>>
>>
>>
>> The .rtp file for CO2
>>
>> [ CO ]
>> [ atoms ]
>> D1 D1 0.0000 1
>> D2 D2 0.0000 2
>> CO CE 0.7000 3
>> OC1 OE -0.3500 4
>> OC2 OE -0.3500 5
>> [ bonds ]
>> CO OC1
>> CO OC2
>>
>>
>> Can anyone please check above file parts whether I'm doing correct or
>> not ?
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list