[gmx-users] dipole moment
Dommert Florian
dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de
Mon May 14 12:48:43 CEST 2012
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 12:27 +0200, XAvier Periole wrote:
> Interesting ...
>
> do you have a reference for this?
>
Sure, a detailed discussion about charges for the liquid phase and
results for molecular ionic liquids are published in:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1FD00051A
and
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct200375v
while the theory is based on:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3060164
and applied to water in:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct1002048
/Flo
> XAvier.
>
> On May 14, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Dommert Florian wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 09:59 +0200, XAvier Periole wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> You do not need to use the polarizable martini water model to
> >> calculate the dipole of molecules. Or I am missing a point here!
> >>
> >>
> >> g_dipole should do the work
> >>
> >> XAvier.
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I want to point to another problem. If you simulate with a classical
> > force field, you usually have an effective set of partial charges.
> > This
> > means polarization effects are often included in the partial charges.
> > This in turn requires an appropriate calculation of the dipoles. A
> > simple sum over the charges, like g_dipole or g_current does, is not
> > sufficient. The true dipoles are only obtained, if the results from
> > the
> > MD are multiplied with a certain factor the is related to the
> > high-frequency limit of the dielectric constant, the electronic
> > dielectric constant. We have performed several studies on molecular
> > ionic liquids and showed, that with a set of bulk charges, the dipole
> > moments are reproduced correctly, if this electronic dielectric
> > constant
> > is taken into account appropriate. Also for water or any other
> > molecule,
> > the same arguments hold. For example, if TIP4P water is considered.
> > Calculating the dielectric constant gives a value around 50, which is
> > small compared to the exp. value of 80. However, if the correct
> > dipoles
> > are considered, a simulated value of around 80 is the result. Hence,
> > it
> > depends on the parametrization of the partial charges, how the dipole
> > moment or any related property has to be calculated.
> >
> > If you are just interested in the static limit, an effective
> > description
> > with static partial charges is sufficient in my opinion. However, as
> > soon as you are also interested in the time behavior, like the
> > frequency
> > spectrum of the dielectric constant or conductivity, you consider the
> > electronic polarization explicitly with a corresponding force field,
> > as
> > Justin mentioned.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Flo
> >
> >
> >> On May 13, 2012, at 15:11, dina dusti <dinadusti at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Dear Justin,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much from your response.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards
> >>> Dina
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ____________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> From: Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
> >>> To: dina dusti <dinadusti at yahoo.com>; Discussion list for GROMACS
> >>> users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> >>> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 5:23 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] dipole moment
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/13/12 8:41 AM, dina dusti wrote:
> >>>> Dear GROMACS Specialists,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have one system consists of water and two other molecules. I
> >>> work by MARTINI
> >>>> CG force field. I want to calculate dipole moment of molecules in
> >>> water.
> >>>> May I ask you to help me, Please?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I doubt you can. Unless you are using version 2.P of the force
> >>> field (which contains polarizable water), MARTINI uses a single,
> >>> uncharged particle to represent water. If there are no charges,
> >>> there is no dipole.
> >>>
> >>> -Justin
> >>>
> >>> -- ========================================
> >>>
> >>> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> >>> Department of Biochemistry
> >>> Virginia Tech
> >>> Blacksburg, VA
> >>> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> >>> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
> >>>
> >>> ========================================
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >>> Please search the archive at
> >>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> >>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >> --
> >> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
> >> before posting!
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > --
> > Florian Dommert
> > Dipl. - Phys.
> >
> > Institute for Computational Physics
> > University Stuttgart
> >
> > Pfaffenwaldring 27
> > 70569 Stuttgart
> >
> > EMail: dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de
> > Homepage: http://www.icp.uni-stuttgart.de/~icp/Florian_Dommert
> >
> > Tel.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563613
> > Fax.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563658
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
> > before posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
--
Florian Dommert
Dipl. - Phys.
Institute for Computational Physics
University Stuttgart
Pfaffenwaldring 27
70569 Stuttgart
EMail: dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de
Homepage: http://www.icp.uni-stuttgart.de/~icp/Florian_Dommert
Tel.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563613
Fax.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563658
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120514/e12e1153/attachment.sig>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list