[gmx-users] PMF profile from Umbrella - Plateau
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed May 16 16:38:14 CEST 2012
On 5/16/12 10:25 AM, Steven Neumann wrote:
> Dear Justin,
> I pulled my ligad away of 6nm from the protein and obtained beautiful and smooth
> curve of PMF using 28 windows. Starting from zero kcal/mol corresponding to app
> 0.3 nm then minima and curve increase till my plateau which starts from app 1 nm
> - then I have nearly straight line till 6.3 nm.
> My question: Can I decrease pulling distance to save time for the future
> simualtions with this system in terms of number of water molecules? Shall I just
> pull it away of 2-3 nm and I will obtain the same deltaG?
Ideally, one would separate the molecules such that they are no longer
interacting. Obviously with methods like PME this is impossible, so what you're
after is sufficient separation such that there is negligible interaction between
the protein and ligand. The required distance depends on the nature and size of
the ligand, the types of interactions it experiences, and the cutoffs used.
Keep in mind that even if a molecule is beyond the longest nonbonded cutoff,
there are still effects like water ordering that can persist up to about 1.0 nm,
so I would certainly make sure that all the atoms of the ligand and protein are
separated by a minimum of twice the longest cutoff or so to account for this
effect. Note that this would imply the use of g_mindist, not g_dist, as the
distance I'm talking about is not the same as the COM distance.
That's just my own rule of thumb for an initial check; you'll have to analyze
your own system to decide what's happening and what you should do.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users