AW: [gmx-users] question about the minimization
reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Thu Oct 18 12:04:47 CEST 2012
Hi Felix,
thank you for your answer.
So you think that a force of 3.2341940e+02 is okey? To work on?
I also tried to work on with a NVT run but then I got many many LINCS
warnings:
Step 1114, time 2.228 (ps) LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.000169, max 0.001796 (between atoms 3480 and 3482)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
3480 3482 30.3 0.1090 0.1092 0.1090
Step 1121, time 2.242 (ps) LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.000108, max 0.000561 (between atoms 2000 and 2001)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
2002 2005 30.4 0.1090 0.1090 0.1090
And in the end there is the error:
Fatal error:
11 particles communicated to PME node 2 are more than 2/3 times the
cut-off out of the domain decomposit
ion cell of their charge group in dimension x.
I looked it up on the GROMACS site and it was written there that such a
error is caused by a not well equilibrated system.
So I thought that the high force might be the reason.
What do you think?
Thanks again!!
> Hi Eva,
>
> The change in energy in every step became smaller than the machine
> precision can represent (as is stated in the output). In other words: your
> system is minimized to a very high degree.
> A value of 10 for the Fmax is very low for a system like yours, even with
> a pure protein in water system you probably wouldn't hit this value.
> Furthermore, 30.000 steps for a minimization seems pretty high to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Felix
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
> Im Auftrag von reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 10:56
> An: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Betreff: [gmx-users] question about the minimization
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a question about the minimization of my protein. For this
> minimization I fixed the backbone and the membrane atoms which around my
> protein.
>
> I minimized it 30000 steps long but after step 20385 it stops with the
> output:
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 20385 steps, but did
> not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
> Potential Energy = -8.8805600e+05
> Maximum force = 3.2341940e+02 on atom 3050
> Norm of force = 2.0930219e+00
>
> I do not see why it can not reach a lower force.
>
> I already looked at the structure with Pymol and there I saw that the atom
> 3050 is in a loop and do not interact with any other residue.
>
> My .mdp file looks like this:
>
> define = -DPOSRES
> integrator = steep
> emtol = 10
> nsteps = 30000
> nstenergy = 1
> energygrps = System
> coulombtype = PME
> rcoulomb = 0.9
> rvdw = 0.9
> rlist = 0.9
> fourierspacing = 0.12
> pme_order = 4
> ewald_rtol = 1e-5
> pbc = xyz
>
> Do you see a reason why it can not reach a force lower than 10?
>
> Thank you,
> Eva
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list