AW: [gmx-users] question about the minimization

Erik Marklund erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se
Thu Oct 18 13:37:26 CEST 2012


 This is not an NVT run. This is EM. Furthermore, I don't see the point in combining position restraints with EM.

Erik

18 okt 2012 kl. 12.15 skrev reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de:

> Hi Erik,
> 
> my .mdp file looks like this:
> 
> define                  = -DPOSRES
> integrator              = steep
> emtol                   = 10
> nsteps                  = 30000
> nstenergy               = 1
> energygrps              = System
> coulombtype             = PME
> rcoulomb                = 0.9
> rvdw                    = 0.9
> rlist                   = 0.9
> fourierspacing          = 0.12
> pme_order               = 4
> ewald_rtol              = 1e-5
> pbc                     = xyz
> 
> 
> And yes, I use constraints. I have a membrane represented by dummy atoms
> around my protein. They are fixed and I also fixed the backbone. Or is
> that a problem.
> 
> Thank you ,
> Eva
> 
> 
>> It could be due to your mdp-settings. What's your time step? Do you use
>> constraints and virtual interaction sites?
>> 
>> Erik
>> 
>> 18 okt 2012 kl. 12.04 skrev reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de:
>> 
>>> Hi Felix,
>>> thank you for your answer.
>>> So you think that a force of 3.2341940e+02 is okey? To work on?
>>> 
>>> I also tried to work on with a NVT run but then I got many many LINCS
>>> warnings:
>>> 
>>> Step 1114, time 2.228 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
>>> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
>>> rms 0.000169, max 0.001796 (between atoms 3480 and 3482)
>>> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
>>> atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
>>>  3480   3482   30.3    0.1090   0.1092      0.1090
>>> 
>>> Step 1121, time 2.242 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
>>> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
>>> rms 0.000108, max 0.000561 (between atoms 2000 and 2001)
>>> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
>>> atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
>>>  2002   2005   30.4    0.1090   0.1090      0.1090
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And in the end there is the error:
>>> 
>>> Fatal error:
>>> 11 particles communicated to PME node 2 are more than 2/3 times the
>>> cut-off out of the domain decomposit
>>> ion cell of their charge group in dimension x.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I looked it up on the GROMACS site and it was written there that such a
>>> error is caused by a not well equilibrated system.
>>> 
>>> So I thought that the high force might be the reason.
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> Thanks again!!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi Eva,
>>>> 
>>>> The change in energy in every step became smaller than the machine
>>>> precision can represent (as is stated in the output). In other words:
>>>> your
>>>> system is minimized to a very high degree.
>>>> A value of 10 for the Fmax is very low for a system like yours, even
>>>> with
>>>> a pure protein in water system you probably wouldn't hit this value.
>>>> Furthermore, 30.000 steps for a minimization seems pretty high to me.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Felix
>>>> 
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>>>> [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
>>>> Im Auftrag von reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 10:56
>>>> An: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> Betreff: [gmx-users] question about the minimization
>>>> 
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>> 
>>>> I have a question about the minimization of my protein. For this
>>>> minimization I fixed the backbone and the membrane atoms which around
>>>> my
>>>> protein.
>>>> 
>>>> I minimized it 30000 steps long but after step 20385 it stops with the
>>>> output:
>>>> 
>>>> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 20385 steps, but
>>>> did
>>>> not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
>>>> Potential Energy  = -8.8805600e+05
>>>> Maximum force     =  3.2341940e+02 on atom 3050
>>>> Norm of force     =  2.0930219e+00
>>>> 
>>>> I do not see why it can not reach a lower force.
>>>> 
>>>> I already looked at the structure with Pymol and there I saw that the
>>>> atom
>>>> 3050 is in a loop and do not interact with any other residue.
>>>> 
>>>> My .mdp file looks like this:
>>>> 
>>>> define                  = -DPOSRES
>>>> integrator              = steep
>>>> emtol                   = 10
>>>> nsteps                  = 30000
>>>> nstenergy               = 1
>>>> energygrps              = System
>>>> coulombtype             = PME
>>>> rcoulomb                = 0.9
>>>> rvdw                    = 0.9
>>>> rlist                   = 0.9
>>>> fourierspacing          = 0.12
>>>> pme_order               = 4
>>>> ewald_rtol              = 1e-5
>>>> pbc                     = xyz
>>>> 
>>>> Do you see a reason why it can not reach a force lower than 10?
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Eva
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>> --
>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> Erik Marklund, PhD
>> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
>> Husargatan 3, Box 596,    75124 Uppsala, Sweden
>> phone:    +46 18 471 6688        fax: +46 18 511 755
>> erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se
>> http://www2.icm.uu.se/molbio/elflab/index.html
>> 
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

-----------------------------------------------
Erik Marklund, PhD
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,    75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:    +46 18 471 6688        fax: +46 18 511 755
erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se
http://www2.icm.uu.se/molbio/elflab/index.html




More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list