[gmx-users] DNA MD PROBLEM
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Sep 17 19:35:18 CEST 2012
On 9/17/12 1:06 PM, Anik Sen wrote:
> Hello,
> This is Anik Sen from India. Am using Gromacs 4.5.5. to do some calculations on solvation and ligand binding interactions with DNA. I have some questions regarding the problem.
>
> As water is present in the system, so according to the manual the define in the .mdp file must be -DFLEXIBLE. No probem in that.
There is no such statement in the manual. In fact, -DFLEXIBLE should only be
set during energy minimization if the convergence is not satisfactory.
> But I read in different works by other people that for DNA they are using NPT ensemble. But there are two couplings in the .mdp file.
> 1. temparature coupling
> 2. Pressure coupling
>
> I want to ask that which coupling will be better for temperature;
> a. Berendsen coupling
> b. V-rescale coupling
> c. nose-hoover coupling
>
> AND for pressure:
> a. Berendsen coupling
> b. Parrinello-Rahman coupling
> c. Martyna-Tuckerman-Tobias-Klein implementation coupling
>
Which algorithms do other people use in similar studies? If they are not
explicitly stated, contact the authors and ask them for more details, as their
papers are incomplete. Have you read the literature associated with all of
these algorithms? Do you know any deficiencies in these algorithms? Many are
discussed in the mailing list archive, especially for the Berendsen methods.
> I am also little confused over the pcoupltype, where options are isotropic; semi-isotropic and anisotropic.
For solutes in water, isotropic pressure coupling is appropriate. For membranes
or crystalline structures, the other two methods are often used.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list