[gmx-users] Re: cannot read frames out from trr files
mu xiaojia
muxiaojia2010 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 05:03:00 CEST 2013
Thanks Justin,
It never happens to my simulations before, is there anyway to figure out
what caused this corruption? the log file and screen outputs didn't
mentioned any error message. I am wandering if it was caused by the
unstable super-cluster I am currently using, because on another
super-clusters, it never happened before.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/13 8:42 PM, mu xiaojia wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the typo, the last evidence"4) I also compared the generated
>> files' sizes, A = B in trr, edr , gro, cpt, if B crashes before reaching
>> 100ns, the size would **NOT*** be the same as A."
>>
>>
> You probably have a corrupted frame. The simulation continued and the
> .trr file continued being written, so you see comparable file sizes.
>
> -Justin
>
>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, mu xiaojia <muxiaojia2010 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear GMX users,
>>>
>>> I am not sure if someone has similar problems before. I cannot read half
>>> of the frames from trr file after md simulation, and I believe my
>>> simulation has already completed.
>>>
>>> I have finished simulations A and B with both gmx4.5.4 and gmx4.5.5. the
>>> only difference between A and B is they are npt simulations under
>>> different
>>> temperature (in mdp file, "ref_t" part )and such difference would not
>>> cause
>>> crash of the simulation. I have successfully finished A, everything looks
>>> perfect (frames can be successfully extracted), but for B, I could not
>>> extract last 70ns' frames from trr.
>>>
>>> 1) My command is like: mdrun_mpi -s -deffnm MD_A -cpi -append, because I
>>> am using super computer so the job will be restarted for multiple times.
>>>
>>> 2) both simulation are 100ns, both log files indicate that they have
>>> finished 100ns simulations. I checked my screen out put for B, whenever
>>> it
>>> restarted, the output on screen is correct and continuously ( something
>>> like: 100000000 steps, 100000.0 ps (continuing from step 95963500,
>>> 95963.5
>>> ps).
>>>
>>> 3) With gmxcheck, it looks that my B simulation only reached 29,7ns(which
>>> means only the first two restart simulation were recorded into trr, which
>>> log files are not saying in this way.)
>>> *
>>> *
>>> *For system A (the successful one), it shows*
>>>
>>> Reading frame 0 time 0.000
>>> # Atoms 72166
>>> Last frame 2000 time 100000.000
>>>
>>>
>>> Item #frames Timestep (ps)
>>> Step 2001 50
>>> Time 2001 50
>>> Lambda 2001 50
>>> Coords 2001 50
>>> Velocities 2001 50
>>> Forces 0
>>> Box 2001 50
>>>
>>> *for system B (the failed one)*
>>>
>>> Reading frame 0 time 0.000
>>> # Atoms 72166
>>> Reading frame 500 time 25000.000
>>>
>>>
>>> Item #frames Timestep (ps)
>>> Step 596 50
>>> Time 596 50
>>> Lambda 596 50
>>> Coords 596 50
>>> Velocities 596 50
>>> Forces 0
>>> Box 596 50
>>>
>>> 4) I also compared the generated files' sizes, A = B in trr, edr , gro,
>>> cpt, if B crashes before reaching 100ns, the size would be the same as A.
>>>
>>> I am wondering what was wrong with my trr file of B . I appreciate for
>>> any
>>> suggestions!
>>>
>>> Sincerely
>>>
>>> Xiaojia
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> ==============================**==========
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Research Scientist
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.**vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin<http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin>
>
> ==============================**==========
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/**mailman/listinfo/gmx-users<http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/**
> Support/Mailing_Lists/Search<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search>before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/**Support/Mailing_Lists<http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list