[gmx-users] amber99 with berger's lipids

[James Starlight]

That paper suggests of using 1.0 nm for all cut-offs
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct200491c

that seems strange to me because with gromos-56 I've used 1.2 nm cutoffs.

James

2013/4/6 Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>

> How about reading the literature on combining AMBER and Berger? :-)
>
> Mark
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:24 AM, James Starlight <jmsstarlight at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Dear Gromacs Users!
> >
> >
> > I'm looking for cut-offs parameters which would be suitable for the
> > simulation of the membrane proteins (bergers united-atom lipids) with the
> > amber-99 force fields (full-atomic protein representation). I'd be
> thankful
> > to anyone who can provide me with such cut-offs for vdw as well as
> coulomb
> > interactions for that force field.
> >
> >
> >
> > James
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> > * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>