[gmx-users] g_x2top is missing bonds

[David van der Spoel]

On 2013-01-31 22:55, FX wrote:
> Hey Matt,
>
> (It's a small world, eh?)
>
> I don't have a particular reason to use Gromacs. I used it for small ions solvation ten years back, I liked it, but every time I have tried to use it since for crystalline systems, I was put off because, as you say, it's probably not what it's designed for.
>
> In that particular case, I set out to use Gromacs because I'm working to reproduce a published paper that used Gromacs.
>
> Anyway, I'm interested in this new thread development (and suggestions as to alternatives more suited to my system), but also in suggestions regarding my original question :)
>
> Cheers,
> FX--
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
try acpype iso g_x2top (this comes straight from the developer).

-- 
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:	+46184714205.
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se    http://folding.bmc.uu.se