[gmx-users] Extending Simulations

[HANNIBAL LECTER]

It is not very clear as to what you are trying to do? If you have the final
coordinates and velocities from a previous simulation, I would recommend
start a simulation using the .gro file and ensuring that you have
gen-vel=no in the .mdp file.

If you have a well-equilibrated system, then the properties should not vary
much. On similar lines, you can stitch multiple .edr files using eneconv.


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Neha <nshafique at wesleyan.edu> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a question that relates to reproducibility in Gromacs. If I have a
> .cpt file from a previous simulation and use that for two simulations using
> tpbconv, how similar should the temperature graphs etc be? When I use the
> .edr files to plot various properties, there is significant difference
> between the two graphs and I am not sure how much is acceptable or
> expected.
>
> Along the same lines, is there any way to get exactly (or as close as
> possible) same trajectories etc that I am missing out on? I am passing the
> .cpt file to mdrun but are there other niggling details I should take into
> consideration?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Extending-Simulations-tp5009399.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>