Fwd: Fw: Fwd: [gmx-users] position restraints
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Mar 15 21:55:11 CET 2013
On 3/15/13 9:43 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
> I also included the position restraints as follows in my top file:
>
> ; Include chain topologies
> #include "topol_Protein_chain_A.itp"
> #ifdef POSRE
> #include "backbone_posre.itp"
> #include "strong_posre.itp"
> #endif
> #include "topol_Protein_chain_B.itp"
> #ifdef POSRE
> #include "strong_posre.itp"
> #include "backbone_posre.itp"
> #endif
>
> As I described earlier, I included position restraints of backbone in top file and also added define = -DPOSRES to minim.mdp file. But it seems that the position restrains have not been included. Would you please suggest me how I can apply position restraints effectively?
>
It won't work because -DPOSRES doesn't trigger #ifdef POSRE. To match your
topology, what you need is -DPOSRE. It is very easy to tell when position
restraints are being applied. A position restraint energy term is written to
the .log and .edr files. If it's not there, you're not applying restraints.
-Justin
> Thanks in advance.
> Your suggestions would be appreciated.
> Shima
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Shima Arasteh <shima_arasteh2001 at yahoo.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Fw: Fwd: [gmx-users] position restraints
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>
> Dear users,
>
>
> Although I put the position restraints on backbone, I get RMSD around
> 0.2 nm. Is it usual?
> This deviation is just for a minimization step only. I' m on doubt
> about keeping the backbone in a fix secondary structure.
> I' d prefer to restraint the backbone completely. Is it possible?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Restraints allow, by definition, for slight deviations.
>
> Erik
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
>
>
>
> Dear gmx users,
>
> I want to use restraints on backbone of my protein to keep its secondary
> structure during minimization and equilibration steps. To do so, I
> generated backbone-restrain.itp and then included it to top file. Next,
> added define = -DPOSRES to minim.mdp file.
> After minimization, when I check the minimization output file, I saw
> that the backbone of input and output files are not exactly the same.
> Is there any step which I have not done to set the restraints correctly?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Sincerely,
> Shima
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list