[gmx-users] GPU performance
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 08:59:41 CEST 2014
Running mdrun and anything else sharing the same hardware requires explicit
management so that they do not actually share CPU cores. mdrun is designed
to saturate the cores, and dramatic nonlinear degradation is exactly what
should be expected from sharing any core.
But rather than speculate, how about looking at the log file for the
performance reports and seeing what is actually different?
Mark
On Apr 4, 2014 6:30 AM, "pratibha" <kapoorpratibha7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I totally agree with you Justin. But I suppose the performance degradation
> (12ns to 100ps/day) is highly drastic in my case (much slower compared to
> running simultaneously same two jobs on same node on CPU which takes
> ~2ns/day). And so I suspect something is wrong.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/GPU-performance-tp5015602p5015632.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list