[gmx-users] High Pressure with Martini system

Sat Apr 26 21:22:41 CEST 2014

Hello Tsjerk, 

I found out the the big frozen membrane was causing the extremely large pressure, so now I made a box with the same previous dimensions, now filled with only W water and ions. The system is running fine. 
After this step, I'm going to convert W to PW and further equilibrate it.Then, afterwards I'm thinking about merging this system with the membrane and protein, and use g-select to remove the overlap. 
A bit more equilibration and then, hopefully, I'll have a production run. 
Thanks for your suggestions, Tsjerk. 

Best, 

Ricardo. 

--- 
Biological Chemistry and Physics 
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Ribeirão Preto 
University of São Paulo - Brazil 
----- Mensagem original -----

> De: "Tsjerk Wassenaar" <tsjerkw at gmail.com>
> Para: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 25 de Abril de 2014 17:59:06
> Assunto: Re: [gmx-users] High Pressure with Martini system

> Hi Ricardo,

> I think 0.47 should be fine. For normal W you can also increase -solr
> to
> get a bit less ordering, although you need to be careful with large
> systems. It should also be possible to add a certain number of
> antifreeze
> particles, but I think you should be fine converting to PW after a
> short
> equilibration with W.

> Cheers,

> Tsjerk
> On Apr 25, 2014 8:54 PM, "Ricardo O. S. Soares"
> <rsoares at fcfrp.usp.br>
> wrote:

> > Hello Tsjerk,
> >
> > You're right, when insanely solvating I sometimes put the water too
> > close
> > or too far. Do you know if 0.47 is a good value for the -sold
> > parameter?
> > From my experience with Martini-W beads and a small bilayer, I
> > usually
> > find that the system tends to freeze.
> > However, I think that this happens after the pressure reaches a
> > reasonable
> > value, so I could in this moment use the triple-w.py script to
> > replace W
> > for PW, right?
> > And then, like you said, perform NVT and NpT equilibration. ..
> >
> > Thanks for your input,
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Ricardo.
> >
> > ---
> > Biological Chemistry and Physics
> > Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Ribeirão Preto
> > University of São Paulo - Brazil
> > ----- Mensagem original -----
> >
> > > De: "Tsjerk Wassenaar" <tsjerkw at gmail.com>
> > > Para: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> > > Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 25 de Abril de 2014 3:31:52
> > > Assunto: Re: [gmx-users] High Pressure with Martini system
> >
> > > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > > Insanely built systems with polarizable watets may be tricky,
> > > especially if
> > > the system is large (not to say humongous). Maybe it's worth
> > > adding a
> > > stage
> > > using normal Martini water, let that equilibrate (NVT and NpT),
> > > and
> > > then
> > > add in the polarizable sites, letting the system equilibrate
> > > again
> > > (NVT,
> > > since the system size should pretty much match the equilibrium
> > > pressure
> > > density).
> >
> > > Cheers,
> >
> > > Tsjerk
> > > On Apr 25, 2014 8:06 AM, "Mirco Wahab"
> > > <mirco.wahab at chemie.tu-freiberg.de>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > On 25.04.2014 00:07, Ricardo O. S. Soares wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I ran an NVT equilibration of a 24mi CG Martini atoms and
> > > >> detected
> > > >> the
> > > >> formation of vacuum spots on the solvent.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > CG Martini has many sphere types, did you solvate your system
> > > > with 24x10^6 MARTINI-W segments?
> > > >
> > > > MARTINI-W is is strongly association LJ-fluid. In large,
> > > > inhomogeneous
> > > > systems (non-optimal box solvation) it is expected to generate
> > > > huge
> > > > forces if either too-close or not close enough packed.
> > > >
> > > > However, the log file shows a very large negative pressure
> > > > (about
> > > > -4e+28)
> > > >> all the time, since the beginning.
> > > >> Despite the negative pressure, when I turn pressure coupling
> > > >> ON,
> > > >> the very
> > > >> first step causes the box to expand (!) too much and then the
> > > >> simulation
> > > >> crashes.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > there you are ...
> > > >
> > > > Things I tried, and failed: changed the tau_p to several values
> > > > (1
> > > > to
> > > >> 500); changed the compressibility; changed the ref_p from 1 to
> > > >> values
> > > >> closer to the starting pressure; changed time-step from 0.02
> > > >> up to
> > > >> 0.0005.
> > > >> Additional info: used the insane.py script to solvate the box
> > > >> with
> > > >> polarizable water; there's a large (frozen) bilayer at the
> > > >> center
> > > >> of the
> > > >> box, It, however is smaller than the box sides, to it doesn't
> > > >> interact with
> > > >> itself via PBC.
> > > >> I'm sure I could provide more info, so please ask me for the
> > > >> specifics
> > > >> and I'll reply.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > How large is the box, is it cubic? How many Lipids in the
> > > > bilayer?
> > > > What do you expect from the frozen bilayer if you
> > > > pressure-couple
> > > > your box dimensions?
> > > >
> > > > Be warned that the MARTINI-Lipids constitute bilayers which are
> > > > very "floppy" and spontaneously fold into spheres (vesicles) if
> > > > the aggregate has more than around 600 Molecules.
> > > >
> > > > BTW.: what hardware are you on if you expect to equilibrate
> > > > a system of that size (if the 2.4x10^6 figure is correct?)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer: I did simulate similar MARTINI systems of 1/10th
> > > > the
> > > > size of yours
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > > or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> > > before
> > > posting!
> >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list

> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!

> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.