[gmx-users] Free energy calculation of multiple solutes
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Feb 20 12:18:33 CET 2014
On 2/20/14, 1:00 AM, Jeff Chen wrote:
> Thank you very much for the quick reply.
> Without using tpbconv and mdrun -rerun, I'm not sure how to get the
> solute-solute energies from gromacs (please let me know it there's a way to do
> this) -- since there are many more solvent molecules, the total potential energy
Nonbonded interactions are decomposed with energygrps. If you didn't include
that keyword and proper settings in the original run, then you need to use mdrun
-rerun, but that doesn't really help for solving this issue. Investigating
energygrps while the free energy code is on is worth checking into on its own.
In principle, it should work, but may simply have never been tested.
> is dominated by solvent-solvent and solvent-solute interactions. However, the
> total potential energy from a simulation (not a free energy simulation) with the
> solute charges set to zero is different than that obtained from a free energy
> simulation with lambda=1 -- the differences are fairly small, but big enough to
> be worrisome.
Good to know. What Gromacs version is this?
> I'll run a system with fewer solvent molecules to get a better handle on what's
> going on -- thanks again for your suggestions.
> It seems most people do free energy calculations with a single solute molecule
> -- in your opinion, is it very unlikely that there is any problem in the way
> solute-solute interactions are handled in the free energy simulations?
That would be a fundamentally serious flaw in the free energy code; I think it
highly unlikely that something so essential is broken.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users