[gmx-users] Why compute capability > or = 2.0??

[Szilárd Páll]

...and because earlier cards were not up to the task of accelerating
GROMACS - unless paired with low-end CPUs.
--
Szilárd


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because 2.0 has things that are useful, and maintaining two versions of any
> code is expensive.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, B P <4gromacs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear users,
>> I wish to know why Gromacs has chosen compute capability >_ 2.0? why 2 not
>> 1.0?
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.