[gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions pbc=xyz

Ming Tang m21.tang at qut.edu.au
Sun Apr 5 12:15:27 CEST 2015


Hi Tsjerk,

I defined only one box. I mean several atoms in one chain run out of the boundary, and I can see them in the box but not in the chain. So I think maybe they run to the nearby box because of the periodic boundary conditions.

Thanks,
Ming 

-----Original Message-----
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of Tsjerk Wassenaar
Sent: Sunday, 5 April 2015 7:43 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] periodic boundary conditions pbc=xyz

Hi Ming,

You have another box in your (infinite) periodic system?

Cheers,

Tsjerk


On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ming Tang <m21.tang at qut.edu.au> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I did a simulation using periodic boundary conditions pbc=xyz. It 
> turns out that the box is defined too small, and some atoms go to another box.
> Does this affect the simulation result? If not, how to display the 
> real model (without separation) in VMD?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ming
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before 
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or 
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>



--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list