[gmx-users] a question related to gmx energy minimization
brettliu123 at 163.com
Sun Apr 26 15:54:16 CEST 2015
Will you please explain to me why the RMSD in this step is so large? For this reason I think there is something wrong.
I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
At 2015-04-26 20:59:59, "Tsjerk Wassenaar" <tsjerkw at gmail.com> wrote:
>Too high for what?
>You do EM because you just built (part of) your system, and in doing so
>introduced clashes and non-ideal geometries. These lead to high potential
>energy, so you relax them with EM. What you see is how much the system
>relaxed. Noone usually cares how much potential energy was lost during EM.
>The thing that matters is whether the resulting system is relaxed enough to
>run the simulation.
>On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Brett <brettliu123 at 163.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I just run the command gmx energy -f em.edr -o potential.xvg for my energy
>> minimization step MD, but I find the RMSD given by this command is 142611,
>> which I regard to be too high.
>> Will you please explain to me what leads to the so high RMSD (Err.Est is
>> 53000, Tot-Drift is -341107 KJ/mol)?
>> I am looking forward to getting your reply.
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
>Gromacs Users mailing list
>* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>* For (un)subscribe requests visit
>https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users