[gmx-users] creating an "infinite" filament with editconf

Igaev, Maxim maxim.igaev at mpibpc.mpg.de
Wed Dec 9 23:06:53 CET 2015


This has indeed helped! I've turned off the pressure coupling completely. The simulation is not crashing anymore. I will try to let the system equilibrate a bit and start to introduce some pressure control.



________________________________________
Von: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se]" im Auftrag von "Alexey Shvetsov [alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 22:06
An: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Cc: gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
Betreff: Re: [gmx-users] creating an "infinite" filament with editconf

Hi!

I previosly tryed to create an infinite filaments for RecA proteins. The
trick is not to apply pressure coupling in direction of filament access.

Igaev, Maxim писал 07-12-2015 13:54:
> Dear Gromacs Users,
>
> I have a protein dimer and would like to make an "infinite" filament
> out of it in z direction by using periodic boundary conditions and
> editconf. What I've done so far is
>
> a) I've generated a topology for the dimer via
>
> pdb2gmx -f dimer.pdb -o dim.gro -p dim.top -i dim.itp -water tip3p
> (force field was chosen interactively)
>
> b) and created a periodic box by using editconf
>
> editconf -f dim.gro -o dim_box.gro -bt triclinic -box 13.4 9.4 8.6
> -center 6.7 4.7 4.3
>
>
> If I understand editconf correctly, it is supposed to create a
> periodic box of sizes 13.4 x 9.4 x 8.6 and place the dimer's center of
> mass to (6.7, 4.7, 4.3) in this box. The size "8.6 nm" in z direction
> is the priodicity of my dimer, which means that the dimer doesn't fit
> completely into the box; some parts are sticking out. But this is
> needed to establish the periodicity.
>
> When I try to equilibrate my system after sufficient energy
> minimization I get an error like "X particles communicated to PME node
> Y are more than a cell length out of the domain decomposition cell of
> their charge group", which means that my system is blowing up and I
> probably have a bad starting structure. I then checked whether my
> dimer has some steric clashes and it was fine. I could equilibrate my
> dimer in a normal water box (isolated dimer) and the simulation was
> just fine.
>
> I wonder if I did something wrong during the editconf step. Should I
> wrap my dimer into the box after editconf so that I have no parts
> sticking out of the box?
> In NAMD, a similar approach worked well - I just took my dimer and
> surrounded it by waters to have a box of sizes 13.4 x 9.4 x 8.6 and
> applied PBC to it. But how to do the same in GROMACS?
>
>
> Thank you in advance for your help!
>
> Cheers,
> Maxim

--
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov, PhD
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
FSBI Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute,
Leningrad region, Gatchina, Russia
mailto:alexxyum at gmail.com
mailto:alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list