[gmx-users] OPLS definition of Phenyl palmitate
Ebert Maximilian
m.ebert at umontreal.ca
Fri Jun 5 22:40:43 CEST 2015
Dear list,
I ran into some problem to define the topology of phenyl palmitate. My main problem is a missing dihedral angle definition in OPLS/AA. Here is a sketch of the molecule without hydrogen (I hope it turns out to be readable in the email):
O17
||
C21 - C20 C16 (C)n
/ \ / \ / \
C22 C19 - O18 C15 C1
\ /
C23 - C24
I think I defined the atom types correctly:
[ atoms ]
; nr type resi res atom cgnr charge mass
1 opls_768 1 PNR C22 4 -0.1952 12.01100
2 opls_145 1 PNR C21 5 -0.0500 12.01100
3 opls_145 1 PNR C20 6 -0.1550 12.01100
4 opls_145 1 PNR C23 7 -0.0500 12.01100
5 opls_145 1 PNR C24 8 -0.1550 12.01100
6 opls_472 1 PNR C19 9 0.1591 12.01100
7 opls_473 1 PNR O18 10 -0.3732 15.99940
8 opls_465 1 PNR C16 11 0.6491 12.01100
9 opls_466 1 PNR O17 12 -0.5100 15.99940
10 opls_136 1 PNR C15 13 -0.1264 12.01100
11 opls_136 1 PNR C14 14 -0.0804 12.01100
12 ….
The problem is now in the ester since there is no dihedral definition of CA OS C_2 O_2 and CA OS C_2 CT in OPLS/AA. I assigned C19 the atom type 472 which is Cipso phenyl ester with type CA and hence O18 473 (AA -OR phenyl ester). Do I understand 472 correctly? How can I resolve the missing two dihedral angles?
I also wanted to know if somebody has an idea what is meant by: AA C: esters - for R on C=O, use #280-#282 of the atom type opls_465. Do I need in this case to assign opls_280 to C15 and opls_282 to the corresponding hydrogens since they are the R of the ester?
Thank you very much for your advice,
Max
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list