[gmx-users] confusion on NPT MD simulation
V.V.Chaban
vvchaban at gmail.com
Tue Jun 16 00:14:51 CEST 2015
If your protein structure is retained, your procedure is all right.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Ming Tang <m21.tang at qut.edu.au> wrote:
> Dear Justin,
>
> I got a problem making me confused for weeks.
> I found 2 journals, in which the author kept parts of their protein to equilibrate their system in NPT. Is there any other methods to keep atoms fixed during NPT equilibrium besides freezing them?
> As you mentioned, freezing and pressure coupling are incompatible. My first understanding was that I cannot fix atoms during NPT. Therefore, I have been steering my collagen in NVT recently. After minimization, I equilibrated my collagen in NVT with the heavy atoms restrained (define = -DPOSRES) for 20ns, and then stretched it using pull code. Do you think this simple process can give a good starting point for SMD?
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of Justin Lemkul
> Sent: Monday, 1 June 2015 9:46 PM
> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] confusion on NPT MD simulation
>
>
>
> On 6/1/15 4:40 AM, Ming Tang wrote:
>> Dear gromacs experts,
>>
>> I tried to equilibrate a triple helix using NPT, and the .mdp file is like this:
>>
>> DEFINE = -DPOSRES
>> integrator = md
>> dt = 0.0009
>> nsteps = 1000000
>> nstxout = 0
>> nstvout = 0
>> nstlog = 10000
>> nstxtcout = 10000
>> xtc-precision = 10
>> cutoff-scheme = verlet
>> coulombtype = reaction-field-zero
>> coulomb-modifier = potential-shift-verlet rcoulomb-switch = 0.8
>> rcoulomb = 1.4
>> epsilon_r = 15
>> vdw-modifier = force-switch
>> rvdw-switch = 0.8
>> rvdw = 1.4
>> tcoupl = v-rescale
>> tc-grps = Protein non-protein
>> tau-t = 1.0 1.0
>> ref-t = 310 310
>> Pcoupl = parrinello-Rahman
>> Pcoupltype = isotropic
>> tau-p = 5
>> compressibility = 3e-4
>> ref-p = 1.0
>> refcoord_scaling = all
>> pbc = xyz
>> freezegrps = C
>> freezedim = Y Y Y
>>
>> C is a group containing atoms of both the first and the last residues in all the three chains.
>> But after 18ns' simulation, I found the one end of the triple helix moved. Could you help to tell me whether this is normal or there is something wrong with my simulation?
>> Then, I tried to use berendsen for both tcoupl and pcoupl. It turned out that both ends were fixed. I need to keep the original geometry shape of the triple helix, but berendsen algorithm is believed to be inaccurate.
>>
>
> Freezing and pressure coupling are incompatible; see notes in the manual.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list