[gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling result

Warren Gallin wgallin at ualberta.ca
Sun Mar 1 23:38:18 CET 2015


The equation you refer to is:

∆G=RTln(Kd)  [The extra factor in the Wikipedia entry is unnecessary, since  there is no actual unit for the “concentration terms” ; the relevant number is activity, which is dimensionless and which approaches the numerical value of the concentration when the concentrations are small.]

So there is no concentration term to consider.

Warren Gallin

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Alexander Law <alexander.law at pg.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> 
> Dear gmx-users
> 
> Is it possible to produce a valid dissociation constant value from gibbs free energy value produced from umbrella sampling?
> 
> The equation is given at the bottom of the this wikipedia page:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_constant
> 
> Is the concentration term vital since the ligand and the protein at a 1:1 mol ratio?
> 
> This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
> not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not
> guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient,
> please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message
> and any attachments.
> 
> Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more
> information.
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> 



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list