[gmx-users] Protein-ligand system simulations with GROMACS

[Guillem Prats Ejarque]

Dear Dries,

First of all, I performed my trials in basis of the protein-ligand tutorial that you say. However, it seemed to me that there was too much waters and I tried to reduce the box. I didn't thought with the periodic image convention. A cutoff of 0.9 would be ok?

When I try to center (using the -c flag) in a dodecahedron box, it appears in a vertex of the "dodecahedron" (it not seems a dodecahedron), as it not happens in a cubic box. I have read that this is due I'm  working with a triclinic cell, and that I should to arrange it with trjconv -ur, but it requests to me a .tpr file that I don't have prior the addition of the ions.

Another strange thing that it happens to my previous simulations is that, when I ran a trial of 20 ns, the protein moves a lot (in a cubic box with 1.0 nm of cutoff), and, at the final, it goes partially outside the box. I know that it has to move a little, but all of this movement is normal? 

Guillem
________________________________________
De: Dries Van Rompaey [dries.vanrompaey at gmail.com]
Enviat el: dimecres, 24 / febrer / 2016 7:41
Per a: Guillem Prats Ejarque
Tema: Re:Re: Protein-ligand system simulations with GROMACS

Hi Guillem,

It's best to keep everything on the mailing list, so that other people with your problem can find all of the posts by googling.

You could try centering with editconf explicitly, with the -c flag. Your distance (-d) to the box should be bigger, though. Your cutoffs will likely be around 1 nm, so I'd recommend a -d of at least that much, in order to avoid violation of the periodic image convention.
If you haven't already, I would take a look at Justin Lemkul's Lysozyme tutorial. He goes into great detail on how to set up and solvate your box.

As for NVE/NPT/NVT, that again depends on what you want to observe. NPT is probably the most commonly used setup if you just want to see dynamics and such.

Good luck
Dries

On 24 Feb 2016 12:54 a.m., "Guillem Prats Ejarque" <Guillem.Prats.Ejarque at uab.cat<mailto:Guillem.Prats.Ejarque at uab.cat>> wrote:

Dear Dries,

Thanks a lot for your quick response. In the literature I normally saw runs about one hundred nanoseconds, as you said, but I also saw some runs from fs to μs, so I was a little confused. I will check the paper about the field force, as you recommend.

Regarding the dodecahedron box, first I tried to use it, but the protein does not center in the box. I do not think that this is very important, due to the PBC, but I found it strange, because if I use a cubic box, the protein is very well centered. I prepared the box like this:


editconf -bt dodecahedron -d 0.2 -f complex2.pdb -o complex_solv.pdb

genbox -cp complex_solv.pdb -cs spc216.gro -o complex_ion.pdb -p complex.top


Looking the literature, I have doubts about NVE/NVT/NPT conditions. In some tutorials that I checked, with similar systems (protein-ligand systems) I found that they do the production run in NPT conditions, and the equilibration with NVT/NPT. However, in some papers, they do the whole run and equilibration in NVE conditions. Are there any rules to decide it, at least in protein-ligand systems?


Thanks a lot, and sorry for the inconveniences,


PS: Should I reply to the mail list instead of replying to you directly? I have never used a mail list before.


Guillem