[gmx-users] Minimising forces for vibrational normal mode analysis
Nash, Anthony
a.nash at ucl.ac.uk
Mon Feb 29 15:39:11 CET 2016
Hi Justin,
After some digging I had found that link and made some adjustments (as
presented in the later email).
After a series of energy minimisations (including switching LINCS off, and
dropping the energy step to a very small number), and with the final
command:
grompp_d -f cg.mdp -c modic_cg_3.gro -p system.top -o modic_cg_4 -t
modic_cg_3.trr
Polak-Ribiere Conjugate Gradients converged to Fmax < 0.001 in 6883 steps
Potential Energy = -1.92681826422996e+03
Maximum force = 8.54361662283108e-04 on atom 44
Norm of force = 2.71110116926712e-04
However, when switching to integrator=nm, running grompp_d -f nma.mdp -c
modic_cg_4.gro -p system.top -o modic_nma -t modic_cg_4.trr, and then
mdrun_d, I get:
Maximum force: 5.19179e+01
The force is probably not small enough to ensure that you are at a minimum.
Be aware that negative eigenvalues may occur
when the resulting matrix is diagonalized.
I¹m still struggling to yield a maximum force during the integrator=nm
step, as presented from the earlier cg step. The .mdp files are identical
with the exception of the integrator line.
Thanks
Anthony
Dr Anthony Nash
Department of Chemistry
University College London
On 29/02/2016 12:49, "gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se on
behalf of Justin Lemkul"
<gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of
jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
>On 2/29/16 3:41 AM, Nash, Anthony wrote:
>> Hi Tsjerk,
>>
>> The two .mdp files are virtually identical (the only exception being
>>what
>> defines one as a conjugate-gradient, and the other for normal mode
>> analysis):
>>
>> CONJUGATE GRADIENT:
>> define = -DPOSRES
>> integrator = cg
>> emtol = 0.001
>> emstep = 0.0002
>> nsteps = 1000000
>> nstcgsteep = 100
>> cutoff-scheme = verlet
>> nstlist = 10
>> ns_type = grid
>> rlist = 1.4
>> coulombtype = PME
>> rcoulomb = 1.4
>> rvdw = 1.4
>> pbc = xyz
>>
>>
>> NORMAL MODE ANALYSIS
>> define = -DPOSRES
>> integrator = nm
>> emtol = 0.001
>> emstep = 0.0002
>> nsteps = 1000000
>> cutoff-scheme = verlet
>> nstlist = 10
>> ns_type = grid
>> rlist = 1.4
>> coulombtype = PME
>> rcoulomb = 1.4
>> rvdw = 1.4
>> pbc = xyz
>>
>>
>> The cg energy minimisation did NOT result in any warning about force not
>> converging. The result I got (I just re did it now) was:
>> Polak-Ribiere Conjugate Gradients converged to Fmax < 0.001 in 6994
>>steps
>> Potential Energy = -1.73087278108256e+03
>> Maximum force = 9.97199385029354e-04 on atom 72
>> Norm of force = 4.63373534634654e-04
>>
>>
>> But then when I run normal mode analysis (integrator=nm) I get:
>> Maximum force: 6.97334e+02
>> The force is probably not small enough to ensure that you are at a
>>minimum.
>> Be aware that negative eigenvalues may occur
>> when the resulting matrix is diagonalized.
>>
>>
>> My work flow:
>> grompp_d -f cg.mdp -c modic_en.gro -p system.top -o modic_cg
>> mdrun_d -deffnm modic_cg
>> grompp_d -f nma.mdp -c modic_cg.gro -p system.top -o modic_nma
>> mdrun_d -deffnm modic_nma
>>
>
>Relying only on .gro format is insufficient precision to continue from
>minimization to NMA. Make sure to pass the .trr to grompp -t.
>
>http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Normal_Mode_Analysis
>
>-Justin
>
>--
>==================================================
>
>Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
>Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
>Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
>School of Pharmacy
>Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
>University of Maryland, Baltimore
>20 Penn St.
>Baltimore, MD 21201
>
>jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
>http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
>==================================================
>--
>Gromacs Users mailing list
>
>* Please search the archive at
>http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>posting!
>
>* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>* For (un)subscribe requests visit
>https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list