[gmx-users] add new residue and new atom
Malihe Hasanzadeh
ml.hasanzadeh at gmail.com
Fri Jan 29 17:52:19 CET 2016
Hi
I used a PDB structure for MD simulation which it has a carbamylated Lys
(KCX 220). This residue via carbamyl group bonded to metal in active site.
So I had to define new residue(KCX), I copied parameters of Lys residue and
added carbamyl group and added to .rtp file in amber force field
(99sb)(gromacs5.0.4). I bring KCX parameters in below:
[ KCX ]
[ atoms ]
N N -0.34790 1
H H 0.27470 2
CA CT -0.24000 3
HA H1 0.14260 4
CB CT -0.00940 5
HB1 HC 0.03620 6
HB2 HC 0.03620 7
CG CT 0.01870 8
HG1 HC 0.01030 9
HG2 HC 0.01030 10
CD CT -0.04790 11
HD1 HC 0.06210 12
HD2 HC 0.06210 13
CE CT -0.01430 14
HE1 HP 0.11350 15
HE2 HP 0.11350 16
NZ N3 -0.38540 17
HZ1 H 0.34000 18
HZ2 H 0.34000 19
HZ3 H 0.34000 20
C C 0.73410 21
O O -0.58940 22
CX C 0.73410 23
HX H 0.27470 24
OQ1 O -0.58940 25
OQ2 O -0.58940 26
[ bonds ]
N H
N CA
CA HA
CA CB
CA C
CB HB1
CB HB2
CB CG
CG HG1
CG HG2
CG CD
CD HD1
CD HD2
CD CE
CE HE1
CE HE2
CE NZ
NZ HZ1
NZ HZ2
NZ HZ3
NZ CX
C O
-C N
CX OQ1
CX OQ2
CX HX
[ impropers ]
-C CA N H
CA +N C O
NZ OQ1 CX OQ2
In addition this protein has two Ni ion, that I added its parameters in
.atp .itp and .dat files.
Also my ligand has a F ion that when I docked with the protein, it closed
to Ni ion in active site (distance 2.9 A). when I start MD simulation I
faced with two problems:
1. when I run pdb2gmx gives many warning:
Identified residue MET1 as a starting terminus.
Warning: Residue KCX220 in chain has different type (Other) from starting
residue MET1 (Protein).
Warning: Residue ILE221 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
residue MET1 (Protein).
Warning: Residue HIS222 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
residue MET1 (Protein).
Warning: Residue GLU223 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
residue MET1 (Protein).
Warning: Residue ASP224 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
residue MET1 (Protein).
More than 5 unidentified residues at end of chain - disabling further
warnings.
Identified residue LEU219 as a ending terminus.
My protein has 570 residue, but as you see the gromacs identified residue
LEU219 as a ending terminus.!
2. when I used -missing option and continued my simulations, after energy
minimization, I extract em.pdb file and I saw the distance between NI ion
in active site with F ion in ligand is much more ( ~5 A) than before in
complex.pdb. This means my ligand isn't stable in active site and it is
moving away!
please help me. what is my mistake?why ligand moving away and why gromacs
doesn't identify end of the protein? Is there a relationship between added
parameters and getting away of ligand?
Thanks
Malihe
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list