[gmx-users] add new residue and new atom
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Jan 29 17:56:21 CET 2016
On 1/29/16 11:52 AM, Malihe Hasanzadeh wrote:
> Hi
>
> I used a PDB structure for MD simulation which it has a carbamylated Lys
> (KCX 220). This residue via carbamyl group bonded to metal in active site.
> So I had to define new residue(KCX), I copied parameters of Lys residue and
> added carbamyl group and added to .rtp file in amber force field
> (99sb)(gromacs5.0.4). I bring KCX parameters in below:
> [ KCX ]
> [ atoms ]
> N N -0.34790 1
> H H 0.27470 2
> CA CT -0.24000 3
> HA H1 0.14260 4
> CB CT -0.00940 5
> HB1 HC 0.03620 6
> HB2 HC 0.03620 7
> CG CT 0.01870 8
> HG1 HC 0.01030 9
> HG2 HC 0.01030 10
> CD CT -0.04790 11
> HD1 HC 0.06210 12
> HD2 HC 0.06210 13
> CE CT -0.01430 14
> HE1 HP 0.11350 15
> HE2 HP 0.11350 16
> NZ N3 -0.38540 17
> HZ1 H 0.34000 18
> HZ2 H 0.34000 19
> HZ3 H 0.34000 20
> C C 0.73410 21
> O O -0.58940 22
> CX C 0.73410 23
> HX H 0.27470 24
> OQ1 O -0.58940 25
> OQ2 O -0.58940 26
> [ bonds ]
> N H
> N CA
> CA HA
> CA CB
> CA C
> CB HB1
> CB HB2
> CB CG
> CG HG1
> CG HG2
> CG CD
> CD HD1
> CD HD2
> CD CE
> CE HE1
> CE HE2
> CE NZ
> NZ HZ1
> NZ HZ2
> NZ HZ3
> NZ CX
> C O
> -C N
> CX OQ1
> CX OQ2
> CX HX
> [ impropers ]
> -C CA N H
> CA +N C O
> NZ OQ1 CX OQ2
>
> In addition this protein has two Ni ion, that I added its parameters in
> .atp .itp and .dat files.
> Also my ligand has a F ion that when I docked with the protein, it closed
> to Ni ion in active site (distance 2.9 A). when I start MD simulation I
> faced with two problems:
>
> 1. when I run pdb2gmx gives many warning:
>
> Identified residue MET1 as a starting terminus.
> Warning: Residue KCX220 in chain has different type (Other) from starting
> residue MET1 (Protein).
> Warning: Residue ILE221 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
> residue MET1 (Protein).
> Warning: Residue HIS222 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
> residue MET1 (Protein).
> Warning: Residue GLU223 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
> residue MET1 (Protein).
> Warning: Residue ASP224 in chain has different type (Protein) from starting
> residue MET1 (Protein).
> More than 5 unidentified residues at end of chain - disabling further
> warnings.
> Identified residue LEU219 as a ending terminus.
>
> My protein has 570 residue, but as you see the gromacs identified residue
> LEU219 as a ending terminus.!
>
> 2. when I used -missing option and continued my simulations, after energy
> minimization, I extract em.pdb file and I saw the distance between NI ion
> in active site with F ion in ligand is much more ( ~5 A) than before in
> complex.pdb. This means my ligand isn't stable in active site and it is
> moving away!
>
> please help me. what is my mistake?why ligand moving away and why gromacs
> doesn't identify end of the protein? Is there a relationship between added
> parameters and getting away of ligand?
>
You forgot step 5:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Adding_a_Residue_to_a_Force_Field
pdb2gmx writes your custom residue as its own chain, not bonded to the rest of
the protein, so it is its own separate molecule.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list