[gmx-users] Different Results with Different Platforms

Szilárd Páll pall.szilard at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 18:14:13 CEST 2016


If the regressiontests pass, I'd recommend trying to identify
differences measurable/reproducible between those runs on shorter and
preferably known time-scales.
--
Szilárd


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Kelechi Okoroafor <kvokoroa at g.syr.edu> wrote:
> Thank you very much, Mark.
>
> You are absolutely right in that I do not have enough statistical data
> to definitely say that the structures ought to form at 200ns.
>
> However, I have repeated the experimental set in total 4 times on
> Stampede and twice on my school's cluster.
> In all cases, without exception, all the systems have formed the
> expected self-assembled structures within the 200ns time frame.
>
> But on my desktop, the structure did not happen even after 523ns.
>
> Do you suggest that I keep running the simulation for observation?
>
>
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Kelechi
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list