[gmx-users] Higher that usual salt bridge occupancies in Amber99sb*-ildn forcefield despite adding nonbonded corrections
tyugashev at niboch.nsc.ru
Fri Apr 21 10:19:13 CEST 2017
Care to share a link? I'm interested in reading it, but can't locate the
paper with a casual search.
21.04.2017 01:30, gromacs.org_gmx-users-request at maillist.sys.kth.se пишет:
> The forcefield modifications have been extensively validated by the Aksementiev group (JCTC, 2016) against experimental data on both Gromacs and NAMD,
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users