[gmx-users] WHAM

Rose rose.rhmn93 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 18 09:48:28 CET 2017


What you will do if you don't have a responsible professor? I tried to install GROMACS in my computer vmware>Ubuntu>... but it wasn't successful and I couldn't.Anyway, you're right I shouldn't discuss these problems here.
Thanks again
-Rose

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 18, 2017, at 11:58, Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/18/2017 1:14 AM, João Henriques wrote:
>> First, you don't need "special computers" to run or compile gromacs. It
>> helps to have multiple compute nodes at your disposal, but it isn't a
>> requirement *per se*. Also, you don't need to be root to compile your own
>> gromacs installation. You can indeed install your own gromacs version on
>> the cluster you use to run your simulations.
> Well, I do need "special computers" to run GMX. :)
> Jokes aside, this is a solid point -- even if one uses a Windows machine, virtualbox+linux+gromacs is always useful to tinker at home for when you have no access to the "special computer." That, or cygwin, although that thing nauseates me.
> 
> Rose, if you are a student, it would be a good idea to ask for better instruction from your professors. This board is quite limited in replacing the kind of instruction you may need. Three months is actually a reasonable amount of time to get the basics of MD and Gromacs right. Without those basics, it is completely pointless to try doing any work.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:57 AM, rose rahmani <rose.rhmn93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Justin,I don't have special computers to be compatible with these
>>> softwares and run complex calculations.So i have to connect to some
>>> computers which is not mine and the old version is installed there.i can't
>>> update them because i'm just a normal user and not a root one! So there are
>>> two choices; not using GROMACS at all OR be convinced with the old
>>> versions. i choose latter!
>>> WHO don't like an upgraded software sir?! you are not talking with a
>>> headstrong person ;) i like to use V.2018 but it's not possible for me, i
>>> hope you understand me.💜Just this!
>>> You are talking with 3 months experienced student without any experience in
>>> any similar simulation software before!
>>> 
>>> I agree with you Alex he is a modest person ;)
>>> I understand sometimes it's not possible to say what the problem exactly
>>> is, but i ask to know if you had these problems before how did you solve it
>>> in your system, yes maybe it couldn't be the right answer for another's
>>> system but maybe a clue for someone!
>>> 
>>> You have helped me many times and i really appreciate you for your
>>> attentions and kindness
>>> 
>>> Thank you again dear Justin and Alex
>>> Best regards
>>> 
>>> -Rose
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Rose,
>>>> 
>>>> Although in my opinion Justin does know everything, the problem is with
>>>> your question. You've posted the same thing over and over (and over), and
>>>> noone replied -- this could be an indicator that people simply have
>>> nothing
>>>> to say. We don't know anything about your system, we don't know whether
>>> it
>>>> is stable, what is its dynamics, etc, etc. On top of this, you are using
>>> a
>>>> very outdated Gromacs version.
>>>> 
>>>> From my own experience with all versions above 5.0.x, pull in Gromacs
>>> does
>>>> work well, as long as your system behaves as expected without pulling,
>>> and,
>>>> once that has been confirmed, you use a properly selected set of pull
>>>> parameters. There are basic procedures for checking your system _prior
>>> to_
>>>> production simulations involving external stimuli (fields, pulling, etc)
>>> --
>>>> please follow them. And please, Please be mindful of what this message
>>>> board is, and especially of what it is not.
>>>> 
>>>> Good luck!
>>>> 
>>>> Alex
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/17/2017 1:44 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12/17/17 3:39 PM, Rose wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why you don't answer me?is there anything wrong in my question?
>>>>> Contrary to popular opinion, I don't know everything :) If I don't reply
>>>>> to a question, it is because I have nothing useful to contribute.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But since you asked, diagnosing what appears to be buggy behavior in
>>>>> wildly outdated (and unsupported, as I warned you) versions of the code
>>> is
>>>>> not a wise use of time. Upgrade to the latest version and try again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Justin
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2017, at 17:36, rose rahmani <rose.rhmn93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I try to use umbrella sampling for calculating PMF. i change distance
>>>>>>> between protein and ZNS nanosheet. I use gomacsV4.5.4
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> after minimization and equilibration. i use:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> grompp -f md_pull.mdp -c npt.gro -p topol.top -n index.ndx -o pull.tpr
>>>>>>> this is md_pull.mdp:
>>>>>>> integrator               = md
>>>>>>> dt                       = 0.002
>>>>>>> nsteps                   = 1000000
>>>>>>> nstxout                  = 5000
>>>>>>> nstvout                  = 5000
>>>>>>> nstfout                  = 500
>>>>>>> nstlog                   = 500
>>>>>>> nstenergy                = 1000
>>>>>>> nstxtcout                = 1000
>>>>>>> nstlist                  = 10
>>>>>>> rlist                    = 1.5
>>>>>>> coulombtype              = pme
>>>>>>> rcoulomb                 = 1.5
>>>>>>> vdwtype                  = Switch
>>>>>>> rvdw_switch              = 1.0
>>>>>>> rvdw                     = 1.2
>>>>>>> pcoupl                   = no
>>>>>>> gen_vel                  = no
>>>>>>> constraints              = h-bonds
>>>>>>> ns_type                  = grid
>>>>>>> pbc                      = xy
>>>>>>> freezegrps               = WAL ZnS
>>>>>>> freezedim                = Y Y Y Y Y Y
>>>>>>> energygrp-excl           = WAL WAL ZnS ZnS
>>>>>>> energygrps               = SOL WAL ZnS Protein NA CL
>>>>>>> nwall                    = 2
>>>>>>> wall-atomtype            = C C
>>>>>>> wall-type                = 9-3
>>>>>>> wall-density             = 150 150
>>>>>>> wall-ewald-zfac          = 3
>>>>>>> ewald-geometry           = 3dc
>>>>>>> fourierspacing           = 0.12
>>>>>>> tcoupl                   = v-rescale
>>>>>>> tc-grps                  = System
>>>>>>> tau-t                    = 0.1
>>>>>>> ref-t                    = 300
>>>>>>> ; Pull code
>>>>>>> pull                    = umbrella
>>>>>>> pull_ngroups            = 1
>>>>>>> pull_group0             = ZnS
>>>>>>> pull_group1             = Protein
>>>>>>> pull_geometry           = direction
>>>>>>> pull_vec1               = 0 0 1
>>>>>>> pull_dim                = N N Y
>>>>>>> pull_rate1              = -0.01
>>>>>>> pull_k1                 = 5000
>>>>>>> pull_start              = yes
>>>>>>> pull_nstxout            = 50
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> then: mdrun -s pull.tpr
>>>>>>> then:trjconv -s pull.tpr -f traj_comp.xtc -o conf.gro -sep
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> i got 1000 configuration, i selected 27 of them and foe each of them i
>>>>>>> run md_umbrella.mdp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> for example: grompp -f md_umbrella.mdp -c npt0.gro -t npt0.cpt -p
>>>>>>> topol.top -n index.ndx -o umbrella0.tpr and then:
>>>>>>> mdrun -deffnm umbrella0 -pf pullf-umbrella0.xvg -px
>>> pullx-umbrella0.xvg
>>>>>>>   .This is md_umbrella.mdp file:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ntegrator               = md
>>>>>>> dt                       = 0.002
>>>>>>> nsteps                   = 2000000
>>>>>>> nstxout                  = 5000
>>>>>>> nstvout                  = 5000
>>>>>>> nstfout                  = 500
>>>>>>> nstlog                   = 500
>>>>>>> nstenergy                = 1000
>>>>>>> nstxtcout                = 1000
>>>>>>> nstlist                  = 10
>>>>>>> rlist                    = 1.5
>>>>>>> coulombtype              = pme
>>>>>>> rcoulomb                 = 1.5
>>>>>>> vdwtype                  = Switch
>>>>>>> rvdw_switch              = 1.0
>>>>>>> rvdw                     = 1.2
>>>>>>> pcoupl                   = no
>>>>>>> gen_vel                  = no
>>>>>>> constraints              = h-bonds
>>>>>>> ns_type                  = grid
>>>>>>> pbc                      = xy
>>>>>>> freezegrps               = WAL ZnS
>>>>>>> freezedim                = Y Y Y Y Y Y
>>>>>>> energygrp-excl           = WAL WAL ZnS ZnS
>>>>>>> energygrps               = SOL WAL ZnS Protein NA CL
>>>>>>> nwall                    = 2
>>>>>>> wall-atomtype            = C C
>>>>>>> wall-type                = 9-3
>>>>>>> wall-density             = 150 150
>>>>>>> wall-ewald-zfac          = 3
>>>>>>> ewald-geometry           = 3dc
>>>>>>> fourierspacing           = 0.12
>>>>>>> tcoupl                   = v-rescale
>>>>>>> tc-grps                  = System
>>>>>>> tau-t                    = 0.1
>>>>>>> ref-t                    = 300
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> pull                    = umbrella
>>>>>>> pull_ngroups            = 1
>>>>>>> pull_group0             = ZnS
>>>>>>> pull_group1             = Protein
>>>>>>> pull_geometry           = direction
>>>>>>> pull_vec1               = 0 0 1
>>>>>>> pull_dim                = N N Y
>>>>>>> pull_rate1              = 0.0        ; 1 nm per  ns
>>>>>>> pull_k1                 = 5000
>>>>>>> pull_start              = yes
>>>>>>> pull_nstxout            = 50
>>>>>>> ...........................................................
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> then i use :
>>>>>>> wham -it tpr-files.dat -if pullf-files.dat -o -hist -unit kCal
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> i get histo.xvg and profile.xvg file but the profile.xvg contains nan
>>>>>>> vavlue. i don't know why?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> # This file was created Wed Dec 13 14:54:35 2017
>>>>>>> # by the following command:
>>>>>>> # g_wham -it tpr-files.dat -if pullf-files.dat -o -hist -unit kCal
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # g_wham is part of G R O M A C S:
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # GROwing Monsters And Cloning Shrimps
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> @    title "Umbrella potential"
>>>>>>> @    xaxis  label "z"
>>>>>>> @    yaxis  label "E (kcal mol\S-1\N)"
>>>>>>> @TYPE xy
>>>>>>> 5.723834e-01    -nan
>>>>>>> 6.714198e-01    -nan
>>>>>>> 7.704562e-01    -nan
>>>>>>> 8.694925e-01    -nan
>>>>>>> 9.685289e-01    -nan
>>>>>>> 1.067565e+00    -nan
>>>>>>> 1.166602e+00    -nan
>>>>>>> 1.265638e+00    -nan
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would you please help me? i have not encounter this problem before
>>>>>>> and also i want protein get closer to ZnS sheet during pulling in just
>>>>>>> Z direction and straightforward to sheet( like one straight line to
>>> sheet),
>>>>>>> is this suitable md_pull.mdp file for this approach? and what about
>>> time?is
>>>>>>> 4nS suitable for each window?is it possible at all?
>>>>>>> Would you please help me?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>> Rose
>>>> --
>>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
>>>> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>>>> 
>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>> 
>>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> 
>>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
>>> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>>> 
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> 
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list