[gmx-users] analyzing docking + MD results
MD
refmac5 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 24 22:53:52 CET 2017
Hi Mark,
I looked through the page and links. Is the "Free energy calculations" of
tutorial 6 the one you recommended for binding energy analysis?
Thanks,
Ming
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 7:08 AM, MD <refmac5 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Excellent. Thank you Mark.
> Happy holidays.
> Ming
>
> On Dec 23, 2017 10:14 PM, "Mark Abraham" <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, GROMACS will do that. See
>> http://www.alchemistry.org/wiki/Example_Free_Energy_Calculations (and
>> many
>> other resources)
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 10:29 AM MD <refmac5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Mark,
>> >
>> > Does GROMACS do that or I need to go with other software?
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Ming
>> >
>> > On Dec 23, 2017 6:06 PM, "Mark Abraham" <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Normally one would try to compute the relative free energy of binding
>> > > between the two poses, but that is rather more costly than what you've
>> > done
>> > > so far.
>> > >
>> > > Mark
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017, 07:24 MD <refmac5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Gromacs folks,
>> > > >
>> > > > I want to look at protein peptide interaction. After docking two
>> > > > conformations of the peptide emerged, and both of which make
>> chemistry
>> > > > sense and have similar low binding energies. (+-1 kj/mol). The
>> distance
>> > > > between the two conformations of the peptide is ~8A.
>> > > >
>> > > > Then I tried simulations on the two scenarios of protein peptide
>> > > complexes
>> > > > and the results showed the peptide only shifted very slightly in
>> both
>> > > > simulations. The rmsd, and energy dropping are all similar. I
>> wonder if
>> > > > there are other ways to make a judgement to tell which conformation
>> of
>> > > the
>> > > > peptide makes more sense by analyzing their MD results?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > Ming
>> > > > --
>> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
>> > > >
>> > > > * Please search the archive at
>> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> > > > posting!
>> > > >
>> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> > > >
>> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
>> or
>> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> > > >
>> > > --
>> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
>> > >
>> > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
>> > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>> > >
>> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> > >
>> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> > >
>> > --
>> > Gromacs Users mailing list
>> >
>> > * Please search the archive at
>> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> > posting!
>> >
>> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> >
>> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> >
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
>> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list