[gmx-users] topology servers versus ff

[ABEL Stephane]

Hello,

If you want to use CHARMM for your simulations, do not use PRODRUG to construct your parameters but use ParamChem, instead. 

https://www.paramchem.org/

Stéphane

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:36:27 +0500
From: maria khan <mariabiochemist1 at gmail.com>
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: [gmx-users] topology servers versus ff.
Message-ID:
        <CAEnLiddELrz5Kj+HoTxBvGUvVmT9eCWMH4O7qEoLJcANtNdcdQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Dear gromacs users..

while using charmm27 can i use PRODRUG for topology building.??

when im using prodrug pdb2gmx gives me error of missing atoms but when i
use charmm ff,it doesnt give me that error,so proceeding with charmm27 i
made ligand topology by prodrug and used it for further simulation,when
comes to adding ions step it gives me error of ""atomtypes CH3 not found"".

thanks.


------------------------------

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.

End of gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 159, Issue 58
******************************************************