[gmx-users] puzzled by unexpected [ bonds ] section resulting from running gmx x2top
Jose Borreguero
borreguero at gmail.com
Wed Jun 21 17:40:36 CEST 2017
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your quick reply!
This means x2top is not finding
or using
the right force constant value, right?
I
did
add the bond info into file ffbonded.itp
of
the oplsa.ff/ directory
(https://goo.gl/z5UMot)
.
I also included the types in file
atomtypes.atp
and the non bonded info in
ffnonbonded.itp file. Maybe related to this issue is this line also found
in the output .top file:
#include "
./oplsaa.ff/forcefield.itp"
This line should not be necessary because the .top file contains all
information. Does the line mean that the bond information in the output
.top file is overridden with that gmx later finds under
./oplsaa.ff
?
If so, then the particular value of the force constant in the .top file
would be irrelevant and my problem would be solved! :)
.Jose
.Jose
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/21/17 10:47 AM, Jose Borreguero wrote:
>
>> Dear Gromacs users,
>>
>> I created the .top file for a small silica crystal that contains only two
>> types of atoms, silicon (type SIO) and oxygen (type OSI). The bond
>> potential is:
>> [ bondtypes ]
>> ; i j func b0 kb
>> SIO OSI 1
>>
>> 0.15783
>>
>> 251040
>>
>> After running gmx x2top, the .top file contains
>> [ bonds ]
>> ; ai aj funct c0 c1 c2 c3
>> 1 9 1 1.600000e-01 4.000000e+05 1.600000e-01 4.000000e+05
>> 1 35 1 1.600000e-01 4.000000e+05 1.600000e-01 4.000000e+05
>>
>> I
>> assume 0.16 in c0 and c2 is the result of rounding 0.15783, but I
>> was expecting number 251040 for c1 and c3, got
>>
>> 400000 instead
>> !
>> I don't know the meaning of coefficients c0, c1, c2, and c3
>> ,
>> I could not find some explanation for them
>> .
>> Can anyone point to a place where these coefficients are described in
>> detail? The description may explain the
>>
>> 400000
>> number.
>>
>>
>
> It's the default bonded force constant.
>
> gmx help x2top
> "
> ...
> -kb <real> (400000) Bonded force constant (kJ/mol/nm^2)
> ...
> "
>
> The comment line means little, so there's no specific meaning to c0, c1,
> etc. It generically refers to bonded parameter fields, which for bonds are
> A- and B-state equilibrium lengths and force constants. For dihedrals
> these mean something entirely different.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list