[gmx-users] puzzled by unexpected [ bonds ] section resulting from running gmx x2top
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jun 21 17:43:16 CEST 2017
On 6/21/17 11:39 AM, Jose Borreguero wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply!
> This means x2top is not finding
>
> or using
> the right force constant value, right?
> I
>
>
> did
> add the bond info into file ffbonded.itp
> of
> the oplsa.ff/ directory
>
> (https://goo.gl/z5UMot)
> .
> I also included the types in file
> atomtypes.atp
>
> and the non bonded info in
> ffnonbonded.itp file. Maybe related to this issue is this line also found
> in the output .top file:
>
> #include "
>
> ./oplsaa.ff/forcefield.itp"
> This line should not be necessary because the .top file contains all
> information. Does the line mean that the bond information in the output
> .top file is overridden with that gmx later finds under
>
> ./oplsaa.ff
> ?
> If so, then the particular value of the force constant in the .top file
> would be irrelevant and my problem would be solved! :)
>
Any value found in the .top overrides the force field. Any blank in the
topology is referenced from ffbonded.itp. Anything missing after that generates
a fatal error in grompp. Use -noparam when running x2top if everything is
accounted for in the force field parameter files.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list