[gmx-users] Group-based cutoff on non-bonded interactions with CHARMM22
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Fri May 19 22:28:28 CEST 2017
Historically that was how things were done. Nobody thinks it is a good idea
any more. Use the Verlet scheme plus the recommendations for CHARMM
forcefields in GROMACS and you'll be fine - charge groups are removed
On Fri, 19 May 2017 18:44 Dawid das <addiw7 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear Gromacs Users,
> I am a bit confused whether I shouldn't use charge
> group-based cut-off for electrostatics when using CHARMM22.
> If I shouldn't use it, what is the purpose of specification of charge
> groups in
> original CHARMM files?
> Best wishes,
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users