[gmx-users] Group-based cutoff on non-bonded interactions with CHARMM22
addiw7 at googlemail.com
Sat May 20 14:28:33 CEST 2017
Thank you. Actually I want to do some QM/MM calculations with CHARMM22 for
but not using GROMACS and not all things that are implemented in GROMACS
are available in my
QM/MM package. Nevertheless, I still want to gather as much data as
2017-05-19 22:28 GMT+02:00 Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>:
> Historically that was how things were done. Nobody thinks it is a good idea
> any more. Use the Verlet scheme plus the recommendations for CHARMM
> forcefields in GROMACS and you'll be fine - charge groups are removed
> On Fri, 19 May 2017 18:44 Dawid das <addiw7 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Gromacs Users,
> > I am a bit confused whether I shouldn't use charge
> > group-based cut-off for electrostatics when using CHARMM22.
> > If I shouldn't use it, what is the purpose of specification of charge
> > groups in
> > original CHARMM files?
> > Best wishes,
> > Dawid
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users