[gmx-users] non-neutral system
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Nov 6 13:11:50 CET 2017
On 11/6/17 7:06 AM, João Henriques wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> I just meant that from a purely theoretical point of view, it needs to be
> neutral. This has to do with the convergence of the outer infinite series,
> as the paper Micholas linked clearly states. I sincerely hope I'm not
> botching this up, but this is the conclusion I've withdrawn from reading
> the literature. Now, if the software implementation contains some tricks to
> account for this, that I'm not familiar with and will therefore leave that
> discussion for someone else more acquainted with it.
For your reference, it's explained in dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct400626b
All MD codes can do this when using PME, so it's not really a trick,
just part of PME. It's not intuitive to most users, and not appropriate
in many cases, hence the standard advice of "add counterions."
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list