[gmx-users] lower-end GPUs
nedomacho at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 20:57:53 CEST 2017
Thanks, this is very useful! I was looking at the 1080 and the pricing
is fairly acceptable.
Will keep in mind about CR version. Actually, we wouldn't be buying
anything except for the GPUs. It seems like a colleague of ours is
unhappy with the performance of his Xeon-based workstation and we might
commandeer it to ease his pain.
On 10/3/2017 7:05 AM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
> I think the 1070s and 1080s are the best value for money. These days, given
> that it's I think it costs ~20% more, the 1080 is probably a bit better
> value for money, but it's going to be a bit above $500, I think.
> Also note that we're working on new GPU acceleration-related features that
> will change the CPU-GPU balance in many use-cases, so if you are planning
> to buy hardware, you might want to give the new code (in still CR) a try.
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> A quick question, likely for Szilárd...
>> Now that we got the taste of very decent GPU acceleration with Titan XP
>> cards, I might be getting a brand new workstation with a 22-core Xeon
>> without any GPUs. We plan to install two GPUs in there and Titan XPs would
>> be too expensive for us in this case.
>> Any suggestions on what to invest in for the sub-$500 range per card?
>> Thank you,
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
>> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users