[gmx-users] Perturbing Proteins
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 21:56:52 CEST 2018
Hi,
I can only suggest the references from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_molecular_modeling. GROMACS does
not currently have any MC style move set functionality.
Mark
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:54 PM Sanyam Kapoor <sanyam at nyu.edu> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I unfortunately don't have background in MD. Do you mind pointing me to
> relevant literature? I can take over from there. I believe the key phrases
> are "alternative configurations of a common topology" and "move sets". I
> was planning to do MC style simulations but was worried that I might change
> the topology to an exceptionally bad state.
>
> Also, could you point me to places in Gromacs that can help me do this kind
> of a thing?
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:42 PM Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sanyam Kapoor <sanyam at nyu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Qasim and Joe!
> > >
> > > @Joe
> > > To be more specific, I am in search of valid topologies which are not
> yet
> > >
> >
> > Generally we refer to those as alternative configurations of a common
> > topology.
> >
> > at the energy minima. Since, manually building/generating them would be
> > > impractical, I thought if I could take a topology which has achieved
> its
> > > energy minima and do a valid "perturbation", I could then have many
> such
> > > valid topologies which exhibit non-stationarity.
> > >
> >
> > Monte Carlo style simulations of such systems generate plausible
> > alternative configurations from many different kinds of move sets (see
> > literature). Of course many moves would be to a highly non-physical
> state,
> > which you would accept only with extremely low probability, and
> > essentially all of them will lack stationarity (even though there are
> very
> > many stationary points, they are only a tiny part of the phase space).
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Jordan <e.jjordan12 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are a number of ways to bias a system. Many of them are
> > implemented
> > > > in gromacs. You will need to be more specific about what you want
> here.
> > > >
> > > > The structures you find in the PDB are in an energy minima but these
> > > (lets
> > > > call them physical) minima may not be (lets call them theoretical)
> > minima
> > > > of the force field you chose.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Qasim Pars <qasimpars at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Good question! The nstcomm is the frequency at which the center of
> > mass
> > > > > motion is removed. My guess is that using short frequency for the
> > > nstcomm
> > > > > (e.g. nstcomm=1 while simulation time step is 1 fs, dt=0.001) can
> > > > perturbe
> > > > > the system. That is, the system may not return to its
> > > > starting/unperturbed
> > > > > state within a short time interval, while nstcomm is applied at
> every
> > > > step
> > > > > on the system. Maybe Justin, Mark or the other developers/users can
> > > > comment
> > > > > it better than me.
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 3 Apr 2018, at 23:53, Sanyam Kapoor <sanyam at nyu.edu> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was wondering if there is a principled way to perturb molecules
> > and
> > > > > then
> > > > > > see its energy converge to the stationary state via the
> simulation.
> > > > > > Perturbation could mean changing the coordinates of the atoms,
> > > changing
> > > > > > angles dihedrals etc. Anything related to the topology. I want to
> > see
> > > > > this
> > > > > > without the addition of any solvents in the environment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My concern is that if I perturb randomly, the molecule may no
> more
> > > > remain
> > > > > > in a valid state (bad bond distance or bad angles/dihedrals
> etc.).
> > > Any
> > > > > > ideas here?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another question is that if I pick up any molecule from Protein
> > > > DataBank
> > > > > > and run a simulation without any solvent addition, does it
> converge
> > > > > further
> > > > > > or are those molecules already on some minimum energy value
> > > attainable?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please correct me if I miss some part of the molecular dynamics
> > > > pipeline.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Sanyam Kapoor
> > > > > > Masters in Computer Science
> > > > > > Courant Institute, New York University
> > > > > > https://www.sanyamkapoor.com
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > > > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > >
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > or
> > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > > > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > >
> > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > or
> > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Joe Jordan
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Sanyam Kapoor
> > > Masters in Computer Science
> > > Courant Institute, New York University
> > > https://www.sanyamkapoor.com
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Regards,
> Sanyam Kapoor
> Masters in Computer Science
> Courant Institute, New York University
> https://www.sanyamkapoor.com
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list