[gmx-users] strange GPU load distribution
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Fri Apr 27 20:45:29 CEST 2018
No.
Look at the processes that are running, e.g. with top or ps. Either old
simulations or another user is running.
Mark
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, 20:33 Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
> Strange. There are only two people using this machine, myself being one of
> them, and the other person specifically forces -nb cpu -pme cpu in his
> calls to mdrun. Are any other GMX utilities (e.g. insert-molecules, grompp,
> or energy) trying to use GPUs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Szilárd Páll <pall.szilard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The second column is PIDs so there is a whole lot more going on there
> than
> > just a single simulation, single rank using two GPUs. That would be one
> PID
> > and two entries for the two GPUs. Are you sure you're not running other
> > processes?
> >
> > --
> > Szilárd
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am running GMX 2018 with gmx mdrun -pinoffset 0 -pin on -nt 24
> -ntmpi 4
> > > -npme 1 -pme gpu -nb gpu -gputasks 1122
> > >
> > > Once in a while the simulation slows down and nvidia-smi reports
> > something
> > > like this:
> > >
> > > | 1 12981 C gmx
> > > 175MiB |
> > > | 2 12981 C gmx
> > > 217MiB |
> > > | 2 13083 C gmx
> > > 161MiB |
> > > | 2 13086 C gmx
> > > 159MiB |
> > > | 2 13089 C gmx
> > > 139MiB |
> > > | 2 13093 C gmx
> > > 163MiB |
> > > | 2 13096 C gmx
> > > 11MiB |
> > > | 2 13099 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13102 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13106 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13109 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13112 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13115 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13119 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13122 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13125 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13128 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13131 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13134 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13138 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > | 2 13141 C gmx
> > > 8MiB |
> > > +-----------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------------------+
> > >
> > > Then goes back to the expected load. Is this normal?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
> > > /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list