[gmx-users] Running simulation differences

Justin Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Dec 21 14:40:40 CET 2018


On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:58 PM Gonzalez Fernandez, Cristina <
cristina.gonzalezfdez at unican.es> wrote:

>
> Hi Justin,
>
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding. I am simulating the interaction of a lipid
> with water. I obtain practically the same value for the coulomb interaction
> energy, but I am not able to get a value for the van der waals energy close
> to the published one (although I have used the same settings than the ones
> used in the article). Therefore, I checked tha GMX manual and I tried to
> modified the settings that affect the van der waals energy in order to get
> a better value: vdwtype, vdw-modifier, rvdw and DispCorr (as I am using
> GROMOS96 FF I don't consider rvdw-switch).
>
>
What are your settings in NAMD? If you're getting a different result then
either the input settings for the energy function are different or there is
some difference in the system's topology.

-Justin


>
> This is the .mdp file:
>
>
> title                = Lipid A  simulation
> ; Run parameters
> integrator          = md        ; leap-frog integrator
> nsteps                = 5500000        ; 2 * 50000 = 100 ps
> dt                    = 0.002        ; 2 fs
> ; Output control
> nstxout                = 5000        ; save coordinates every 1.0 ps
> nstvout                 = 5000        ; save velocities every 1.0 ps
> nstenergy           = 5000        ; save energies every 1.0 ps
> nstlog                = 5000        ; update log file every 1.0 ps
> nstxtcout               = 5000
> xtc-grps                = System
> ; Bond parameters
> continuation            = yes        ; restarting after NVT
> constraint_algorithm    = lincs        ; holonomic constraints
> constraints            = all-bonds    ; all bonds (even heavy atom-H
> bonds) constrained
> lincs_iter            = 1            ; accuracy of LINCS
> lincs_order            = 4            ; also related to accuracy
> ; Nonbonded settings
> cutoff-scheme           = Verlet
> ns_type                = grid        ; search neighboring grid cells
> nstlist                = 5        ; 20 fs, largely irrelevant with Verlet
> rcoulomb            = 1.4        ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
> rvdw                = 1.4        ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
> rlist                   = 1.41
> vdwtype                 = Cut-off
> vdw_modifier            = None
> verlet-buffer-drift     = -1
> ; Electrostatics
> coulombtype            = Reaction-Field    ; Particle Mesh Ewald for
> long-range electrostatics
> epsilon_rf              = 61
> ; Temperature coupling is on
> tcoupl           = nose-hoover    ; modified Berendsen thermostat
> tc-grps                = System    ; two coupling groups - more accurate
> tau_t                = 0.2               ; time constant, in ps
> ref_t                = 298                ; reference temperature, one for
> each group, in K
> ; Pressure coupling is oN
> pcoupl                  = Parrinello-Rahman         ; Pressure coupling on
> in NPT
> pcoupltype              = isotropic                 ; uniform scaling of
> box vectors
> tau_p                   = 0.5                       ; time constant, in ps
> ref_p                   = 1.0                       ; reference pressure,
> in bar
> compressibility         = 4.5e-5                    ; isothermal
> compressibility of water, bar^-1
> ;refcoord_scaling        = com
> ; Periodic boundary conditions
> pbc                = xyz            ; 3-D PBC
> ;Dispersion correction
> ;DispCorr            = EnerPres    ; account for cut-off vdW scheme
> ; Velocity generation
> gen_vel                 = no        ; assign velocities from Maxwell
> distribution
> ;gen_temp            = 278        ; temperature for Maxwell distribution
> ;gen_seed            = -1        ; generate a random seed
>
> I would greatly appreciate if you could help me, because I don't know what
> else I can do,
>
> C.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> De: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se <
> gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se> en nombre de Justin
> Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
> Enviado: jueves, 20 de diciembre de 2018 19:52:20
> Para: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Asunto: Re: [gmx-users] Running simulation differences
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:01 PM Gonzalez Fernandez, Cristina <
> cristina.gonzalezfdez at unican.es> wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> >
> > Do you think that the difference between a value of -280 ± 37 kj/mol
> > obtained by Gromacs and -367 kj/mol obtained by NAMD can be acceptable?
> >
> >
> As I said before, no, a massive difference like that, outside the error
> bars, is not acceptable.
>
> If you want more useful advice, you'll have to tell us exactly what you're
> doing and trying to compare.
>
> -Justin
>
>
> >
> > Thank you so much for all your help
> >
> > C.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se <
> > gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se> en nombre de Justin
> > Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
> > Enviado: martes, 18 de diciembre de 2018 15:34:07
> > Para: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> > Asunto: Re: [gmx-users] Running simulation differences
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:01 AM Gonzalez Fernandez, Cristina <
> > cristina.gonzalezfdez at unican.es> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi again Justin,
> > >
> > > I've been thinking about the normal variability between MD simulations
> > you
> > > commented. I am simulating the interaction of a lipid with water, but
> the
> > > van der waals energy value that I obtain (-257.25  ± 35.86 kj/mol) for
> me
> > > is considerably different from the published value (-361 kj/mol).
> > However,
> > > according to your email maybe these values can be considered similar.
> Do
> > > you think my value and the published one are similar? How can I reduced
> > the
> > > error of the results because my value correspond to a long
> >
> >
> > I would not call those values similar at all. The two quantities you
> posted
> > before were within error of one another; those are similar. A difference
> of
> > over 100 kJ/mol, outside error, is enormous. You need to evaluate what
> > you're doing because in that case, I suspect something is inconsistent
> > between what is published and what you're doing.
> >
> >
> > > simulation (60 ns)? Could you recommend me a paper where is stated the
> > > common deviations/errors that are acceptable to a simulation result?
> > >
> >
> > There is none to my knowledge, and certainly can't be generalized.
> > Different quantities have different tolerances. Different software may
> > produce somewhat different results, as well.
> >
> > Also I wouldn't consider 60 ns long, by any means :)
> >
> > -Justin
> >
> > --
> >
> > ==========================================
> >
> > Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> >
> > Assistant Professor
> >
> > Office: 301 Fralin Hall
> > Lab: 303 Engel Hall
> >
> > Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
> > 340 West Campus Dr.
> > Blacksburg, VA 24061
> >
> > jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
> > http://www.thelemkullab.com
> >
> >
> > ==========================================
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ==========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
>
> Assistant Professor
>
> Office: 301 Fralin Hall
> Lab: 303 Engel Hall
>
> Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
> 340 West Campus Dr.
> Blacksburg, VA 24061
>
> jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
> http://www.thelemkullab.com
>
>
> ==========================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>


-- 

==========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Office: 301 Fralin Hall
Lab: 303 Engel Hall

Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com


==========================================


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list