[gmx-users] why does gromacs want to draw a cmap covering my new inserted residue?
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Jan 15 21:10:16 CET 2018
On 1/15/18 3:06 PM, MD wrote:
> I wonder if there is a way I can create my own cmap for those modified type
> names and incorporate the cmap to the cmap.itp?
That will end up being far more work than a proper parametrization of
the side chain while leaving the backbone alone at standard atom types
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:56 PM, MD <refmac5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> updated, I figured it is because my N and CA have different type names
>> than charmm, which is weird cause I used CHARMM GUI to get the itp files
>> for the modified amino acid. Would it be an easy fix if I manually change
>> those two atom names or I should go a different route for the cmap problem?
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:34 PM, MD <refmac5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Gromacs folks,
>>> I have a modified amino acid which has all the parameters set. However,
>>> the last error is the "cmap torsion between atoms xxxxxxx" and it would't
>>> go away. Basically the cmap contains atoms of C-N-CA-C-N from three
>>> residues, where the CA is my newly modified residue. THe only thing I could
>>> think of is the newly modified residue was not recognized by gromacs, but I
>>> have checked the residue.dat, the log from pdb2gmx and it looks like this
>>> residue was not considered "alien". Got stuck here any help will be
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users